Comparison Overview

AXA XL

VS

Helvetia Baloise Group

AXA XL

One Bermudiana Road, Hamilton, Bermuda, BM, HM08
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

We are a leading provider of insurance and reinsurance offering innovative risk management solutions for businesses worldwide. We partner with those who move the world forward, navigating complex risks and working across diverse industries to support and empower our clients. Note: We are currently experiencing some technical issues with our recruitment platform which we hope to resolve shortly, please be patient with us, thank you for your interest in jobs at AXA XL.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 10,555
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Helvetia Baloise Group

None
Last Update: 2026-01-20

Helvetia Baloise is the largest multi-line insurer in Switzerland and one of the leading insurance groups in Europe. Every day, more than 22,000 employees are committed to supporting around 13 million customers with insurance, pension and financial solutions – from private individuals and SMEs to international customer groups such as speciality and reinsurance. Headquartered in Basel, Switzerland, Helvetia Baloise is active in a total of eight European markets and in the global speciality markets, combining strong Swiss roots with a clear international orientation. Helvetia Baloise creates security and opens up opportunities, both now and in the future. Through profitable growth and business activities geared towards long-term stability, we facilitate individual solutions for customers, secure an attractive and reliable investment for our shareholders, promote strong partnerships and offer our employees attractive prospects. The Helvetia Baloise Holding Ltd share (HBAN) is traded on SIX Swiss Exchange.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 12,914
Subsidiaries: 13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/axaxl.jpeg
AXA XL
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/helvetia-baloise-group.jpeg
Helvetia Baloise Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
AXA XL
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Helvetia Baloise Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AXA XL in 2026.

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Helvetia Baloise Group in 2026.

Incident History — AXA XL (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AXA XL cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Helvetia Baloise Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Helvetia Baloise Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/axaxl.jpeg
AXA XL
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/helvetia-baloise-group.jpeg
Helvetia Baloise Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

AXA XL company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Helvetia Baloise Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Helvetia Baloise Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to AXA XL company.

In the current year, Helvetia Baloise Group company and AXA XL company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Helvetia Baloise Group company nor AXA XL company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Helvetia Baloise Group company nor AXA XL company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Helvetia Baloise Group company nor AXA XL company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither AXA XL company nor Helvetia Baloise Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither AXA XL nor Helvetia Baloise Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Helvetia Baloise Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to AXA XL company.

Helvetia Baloise Group company employs more people globally than AXA XL company, reflecting its scale as a Insurance.

Neither AXA XL nor Helvetia Baloise Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither AXA XL nor Helvetia Baloise Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither AXA XL nor Helvetia Baloise Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither AXA XL nor Helvetia Baloise Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither AXA XL nor Helvetia Baloise Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither AXA XL nor Helvetia Baloise Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.