Comparison Overview

AXA XL

VS

HDFC ERGO General Insurance

AXA XL

One Bermudiana Road, Hamilton, Bermuda, BM, HM08
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

We are a leading provider of insurance and reinsurance offering innovative risk management solutions for businesses worldwide. We partner with those who move the world forward, navigating complex risks and working across diverse industries to support and empower our clients. Note: We are currently experiencing some technical issues with our recruitment platform which we hope to resolve shortly, please be patient with us, thank you for your interest in jobs at AXA XL.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 10,555
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

HDFC ERGO General Insurance

6th Floor, Leela Business Park, Andheri-Kurla Road, Andheri (East), Mumbai, Mumbai, 400059, IN
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799

HDFC ERGO General Insurance Company Limited was promoted by erstwhile Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd. (HDFC), India’s premier Housing Finance Institution and ERGO International AG, the primary insurance entity of Munich Re Group. Consequent to the implementation of the Scheme of Amalgamation of HDFC with and into HDFC Bank Limited, one of India’s leading private sector bank (Bank), the Company has become a subsidiary of the Bank. The Company offers complete range of general insurance products ranging from motor, health, travel, home and personal accident in the retail space and products like property, marine and liability insurance in the corporate space. With a network of branches spread across wide distribution network and a 24x7 support team, the Company has been offering seamless customer service and innovative products to its customers.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 12,654
Subsidiaries: 43
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/axaxl.jpeg
AXA XL
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hdfcergo.jpeg
HDFC ERGO General Insurance
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
AXA XL
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
HDFC ERGO General Insurance
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AXA XL in 2026.

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HDFC ERGO General Insurance in 2026.

Incident History — AXA XL (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AXA XL cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — HDFC ERGO General Insurance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HDFC ERGO General Insurance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/axaxl.jpeg
AXA XL
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hdfcergo.jpeg
HDFC ERGO General Insurance
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both AXA XL company and HDFC ERGO General Insurance company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, HDFC ERGO General Insurance company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to AXA XL company.

In the current year, HDFC ERGO General Insurance company and AXA XL company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither HDFC ERGO General Insurance company nor AXA XL company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither HDFC ERGO General Insurance company nor AXA XL company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither HDFC ERGO General Insurance company nor AXA XL company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither AXA XL company nor HDFC ERGO General Insurance company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither AXA XL nor HDFC ERGO General Insurance holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

HDFC ERGO General Insurance company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to AXA XL company.

HDFC ERGO General Insurance company employs more people globally than AXA XL company, reflecting its scale as a Insurance.

Neither AXA XL nor HDFC ERGO General Insurance holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither AXA XL nor HDFC ERGO General Insurance holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither AXA XL nor HDFC ERGO General Insurance holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither AXA XL nor HDFC ERGO General Insurance holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither AXA XL nor HDFC ERGO General Insurance holds HIPAA certification.

Neither AXA XL nor HDFC ERGO General Insurance holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.