Comparison Overview

AWS Partners

VS

NEC Corporation

AWS Partners

410 Terry Ave N, Seattle, 98109, US
Last Update: 2025-12-29

AWS Partners and AWS Marketplace sellers are uniquely positioned to help businesses take full advantage of Amazon Web Services (AWS) and accelerate your journey to the cloud. AWS has millions of active customers and over 100,000 Partners globally. More than 90% of Fortune 100 companies and the majority of Fortune 500 companies use AWS Partner solutions and services. Whether you are a fast growing startup, small-medium or large enterprise, or leading government agency, AWS Partners have deep technical expertise and the experience to support virtually every use case, industry, and workload. For businesses actively searching for software on AWS that you can test, buy, and deploy, AWS Marketplace is a digital catalog with thousands of software listings from independent software vendors, including many AWS Partners. AWS Marketplace transforms the way organizations approach software discovery, procurement, provisioning, and governance. It helps customers find and access a breadth of software products across categories like infrastructure, security, big data, and business applications, and streamlines the traditional software supply chain to enable digital transformation.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 89
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
5

NEC Corporation

7-1, Shiba 5-chome, Tokyo, 108-8001, JP
Last Update: 2025-12-25
Between 800 and 849

NEC Corporation has established itself as a leader in the integration of IT and network technologies while promoting the brand statement of “Orchestrating a brighter world.” NEC enables businesses and communities to adapt to rapid changes taking place in both society and the market as it provides for the social values of safety, security, fairness and efficiency to promote a more sustainable world where everyone has the chance to reach their full potential. For more information, visit NEC at http://www.nec.com NEC's Strengths and Competencies ・Named "2017 Global 100 Most Sustainable Corporations in the World"​ an Index Listing the World’s 100 Most Sustainable Corporations ・Named one of the "World's Top 100 Most Innovative Organizations for 2016"​ by Thomson Reuters ・Face recognition technology achieved No. 1 in the recent Face in Video Evaluation (FIVE, *1) testing performed by the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) (*2) (*1) https://www.nist.gov/programs-projects/face-video-evaluation-five (*2) Results shown from the Face In Video Evaluation (FIVE), the Multiple Biometric Grand Challenge (MBGC), the Multiple Biometric Evaluation (MBE) and the Face Recognition Vendor Test (FRVT) do not constitute endorsement of any particular product by the U.S. Government. ** Please note that we reserve the right to delete any comments posted on NEC Corporation’s LinkedIn page that are deemed extremely defamatory or libelous to any company or individual, or that may be offensive to others.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 17,837
Subsidiaries: 16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aws-partners.jpeg
AWS Partners
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nec.jpeg
NEC Corporation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
AWS Partners
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
NEC Corporation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

AWS Partners has 29.87% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NEC Corporation in 2025.

Incident History — AWS Partners (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AWS Partners cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — NEC Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NEC Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aws-partners.jpeg
AWS Partners
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Phishing emails with malicious links, fake resume portfolios hosted on AWS
Motivation: Financial gain, credential theft, follow-on attacks (e.g., ransomware deployment)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Cloud infrastructure vulnerabilities, unauthorized access, data pipeline exploitation
Motivation: Data theft, operational disruption, adversarial attacks on AI models
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Remote Code Execution (RCE)
Motivation: State-sponsored cyber operations
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nec.jpeg
NEC Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

NEC Corporation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to AWS Partners company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

AWS Partners company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas NEC Corporation company has not reported any.

In the current year, AWS Partners company has reported more cyber incidents than NEC Corporation company.

AWS Partners company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while NEC Corporation company has not reported such incidents publicly.

AWS Partners company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other NEC Corporation company has not reported such incidents publicly.

AWS Partners company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while NEC Corporation company has not reported such incidents publicly.

AWS Partners company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while NEC Corporation company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither AWS Partners nor NEC Corporation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

AWS Partners company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to NEC Corporation company.

Neither AWS Partners nor NEC Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither AWS Partners nor NEC Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither AWS Partners nor NEC Corporation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither AWS Partners nor NEC Corporation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither AWS Partners nor NEC Corporation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither AWS Partners nor NEC Corporation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was found in Tenda WH450 1.0.0.18. Affected is an unknown function of the file /goform/PPTPUserSetting. Performing manipulation of the argument delno results in stack-based buffer overflow. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been made public and could be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 8.3
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 7.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability has been found in Tenda WH450 1.0.0.18. This impacts an unknown function of the file /goform/PPTPServer. Such manipulation of the argument ip1 leads to stack-based buffer overflow. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 8.3
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 7.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in omec-project UPF up to 2.1.3-dev. This affects the function handleSessionEstablishmentRequest of the file /pfcpiface/pfcpiface/messages_session.go of the component PFCP Session Establishment Request Handler. This manipulation causes null pointer dereference. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was detected in floooh sokol up to 16cbcc864012898793cd2bc57f802499a264ea40. The impacted element is the function _sg_pipeline_desc_defaults in the library sokol_gfx.h. The manipulation results in stack-based buffer overflow. The attack requires a local approach. The exploit is now public and may be used. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. The patch is identified as 5d11344150973f15e16d3ec4ee7550a73fb995e0. It is advisable to implement a patch to correct this issue.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in PbootCMS up to 3.2.12. The affected element is the function get_user_ip of the file core/function/handle.php of the component Header Handler. The manipulation of the argument X-Forwarded-For leads to use of less trusted source. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X