Comparison Overview

Avon Lake Public Library

VS

Howe Library

Avon Lake Public Library

32649 Electric Blvd., Avon Lake, OHIO, 44012, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.alpl.org

The public library serving the city and school district of Avon Lake, Ohio, and neighbors. Past and present employees can connect here. Fast facts: population served = 24,000 circulation = 400,000 items annually visitors 275,000 annually, 130,000 items in collection. We have one location and we are not part of any consortia save the Ohio Digital Library for ebooks. We are an OCLC lender and supplier.

NAICS: 519
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 37
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Howe Library

13 South Street, Hanover, New Hampshire, 03755, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799
http://www.thehowe.org

The Howe Library was established as Hanover, New Hampshire’s public library in 1900 through a gift from Emily Howe to the newly-formed non-profit Howe Library Corporation. Miss Howe dedicated the first Howe Library in her former family home on West Wheelock Street with “a prayer that this library may prove a blessing to this community to the remotest generation.” The Howe Library Corporation managed the library and its operating budget until 1973 when Hanover residents voted to assume responsibility for the operating budget and the library became a department of the town. At the same time, the library was outgrowing its home on West Wheelock Street and plans began for a new building. Constructed on town land in 1973, this new facility was financed by The Howe Library Corporation with a loan from the town and donations. A large addition was completed in 2005, almost doubling the size. The Howe Library continues to be a partnership between the Howe Library Corporation and the Town of Hanover.

NAICS: 519
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/avon-lake-public-library.jpeg
Avon Lake Public Library
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/howe-library.jpeg
Howe Library
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Avon Lake Public Library
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Howe Library
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Avon Lake Public Library in 2025.

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Howe Library in 2025.

Incident History — Avon Lake Public Library (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Avon Lake Public Library cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Howe Library (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Howe Library cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/avon-lake-public-library.jpeg
Avon Lake Public Library
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/howe-library.jpeg
Howe Library
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Howe Library company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Avon Lake Public Library company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Howe Library company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Avon Lake Public Library company.

In the current year, Howe Library company and Avon Lake Public Library company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Howe Library company nor Avon Lake Public Library company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Howe Library company nor Avon Lake Public Library company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Howe Library company nor Avon Lake Public Library company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Avon Lake Public Library company nor Howe Library company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Avon Lake Public Library nor Howe Library holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Avon Lake Public Library company nor Howe Library company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Avon Lake Public Library company employs more people globally than Howe Library company, reflecting its scale as a Libraries.

Neither Avon Lake Public Library nor Howe Library holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Avon Lake Public Library nor Howe Library holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Avon Lake Public Library nor Howe Library holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Avon Lake Public Library nor Howe Library holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Avon Lake Public Library nor Howe Library holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Avon Lake Public Library nor Howe Library holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References