Comparison Overview

Avid Healthcare

VS

Nicholas James Care Homes Ltd

Avid Healthcare

None
Last Update: 2025-12-19
Between 800 and 849

As a leading provider in the nursing home Industry, we understand the importance of creating a warm and nurturing environment where residents are treated with empathy and respect. From the moment you step through our doors, we are your family. Our dedicated professionals and personnel are familiar with each member of our community personally, ensuring an exceptionally customized journey. Backed by extensive expertise and an enthusiastic team, our dedication lies in providing top-notch care infused with a personal connection. We strive to elevate the standard of care in nursing homes, prioritizing the resident experience through exceptional services, and attentive staff. Our philosophy on obtaining stellar patient care and outcomes is based in a staff centered approach. Staff that are well cared for, provide better quality care and services to their patients.

NAICS: 623
NAICS Definition: Nursing Homes and Residential Care Facilities
Employees: 28
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Nicholas James Care Homes Ltd

30 Station Road , Orpington, BR6 0SA, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-20
Between 750 and 799

Nicholas James Care Homes is a group of 11 family run care homes situated across the South-East of England in the Kent and Sussex area. As a multi-award-winning care home provider, our heritage is rooted in compassion, care, and community. Named after the founder’s sons, the heart of Nicholas James Care Homes is centred around family. This ethos extends beyond our ownership to include our dedicated staff and beloved residents, whom we consider part of our extended family. In 2015, Nicholas James Care Homes joined our sister company, Regal Care, under shared family leadership, reinforcing our commitment to ‘Caring through Generations’.

NAICS: 623
NAICS Definition: Nursing Homes and Residential Care Facilities
Employees: 58
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/avid-healthcare.jpeg
Avid Healthcare
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nicholas-james-care-homes-ltd.jpeg
Nicholas James Care Homes Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Avid Healthcare
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Nicholas James Care Homes Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Nursing Homes and Residential Care Facilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Avid Healthcare in 2025.

Incidents vs Nursing Homes and Residential Care Facilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nicholas James Care Homes Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — Avid Healthcare (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Avid Healthcare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Nicholas James Care Homes Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nicholas James Care Homes Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/avid-healthcare.jpeg
Avid Healthcare
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nicholas-james-care-homes-ltd.jpeg
Nicholas James Care Homes Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Avid Healthcare company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Nicholas James Care Homes Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Nicholas James Care Homes Ltd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Avid Healthcare company.

In the current year, Nicholas James Care Homes Ltd company and Avid Healthcare company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Nicholas James Care Homes Ltd company nor Avid Healthcare company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Nicholas James Care Homes Ltd company nor Avid Healthcare company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Nicholas James Care Homes Ltd company nor Avid Healthcare company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Avid Healthcare company nor Nicholas James Care Homes Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Avid Healthcare nor Nicholas James Care Homes Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Avid Healthcare company nor Nicholas James Care Homes Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Nicholas James Care Homes Ltd company employs more people globally than Avid Healthcare company, reflecting its scale as a Nursing Homes and Residential Care Facilities.

Neither Avid Healthcare nor Nicholas James Care Homes Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Avid Healthcare nor Nicholas James Care Homes Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Avid Healthcare nor Nicholas James Care Homes Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Avid Healthcare nor Nicholas James Care Homes Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Avid Healthcare nor Nicholas James Care Homes Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Avid Healthcare nor Nicholas James Care Homes Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

httparty is an API tool. In versions 0.23.2 and prior, httparty is vulnerable to SSRF. This issue can pose a risk of leaking API keys, and it can also allow third parties to issue requests to internal servers. This issue has been patched via commit 0529bcd.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

5ire is a cross-platform desktop artificial intelligence assistant and model context protocol client. In versions 0.15.2 and prior, an RCE vulnerability exists in useMarkdown.ts, where the markdown-it-mermaid plugin is initialized with securityLevel: 'loose'. This configuration explicitly permits the rendering of HTML tags within Mermaid diagram nodes. This issue has not been patched at time of publication.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

continuwuity is a Matrix homeserver written in Rust. Prior to version 0.5.0, this vulnerability allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to force the target server to cryptographically sign arbitrary membership events. The flaw exists because the server fails to validate the origin of a signing request, provided the event's state_key is a valid user ID belonging to the target server. This issue has been patched in version 0.5.0. A workaround for this issue involves blocking access to the PUT /_matrix/federation/v2/invite/{roomId}/{eventId} endpoint using the reverse proxy.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

LangChain is a framework for building LLM-powered applications. Prior to @langchain/core versions 0.3.80 and 1.1.8, and prior to langchain versions 0.3.37 and 1.2.3, a serialization injection vulnerability exists in LangChain JS's toJSON() method (and subsequently when string-ifying objects using JSON.stringify(). The method did not escape objects with 'lc' keys when serializing free-form data in kwargs. The 'lc' key is used internally by LangChain to mark serialized objects. When user-controlled data contains this key structure, it is treated as a legitimate LangChain object during deserialization rather than plain user data. This issue has been patched in @langchain/core versions 0.3.80 and 1.1.8, and langchain versions 0.3.37 and 1.2.3

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

LangChain is a framework for building agents and LLM-powered applications. Prior to versions 0.3.81 and 1.2.5, a serialization injection vulnerability exists in LangChain's dumps() and dumpd() functions. The functions do not escape dictionaries with 'lc' keys when serializing free-form dictionaries. The 'lc' key is used internally by LangChain to mark serialized objects. When user-controlled data contains this key structure, it is treated as a legitimate LangChain object during deserialization rather than plain user data. This issue has been patched in versions 0.3.81 and 1.2.5.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N