Comparison Overview

Avi Resort & Casino

VS

Hero Gaming

Avi Resort & Casino

10000 Aha Macav Parkway, Laughlin, Nevada, 89029, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

AVI Resort & Casino is located in Laughlin, NV. The resort features 452 rooms, 29 spa suites, a 25,000 foot casino, the largest beach lagoon on the Colorado River and 3 championship golf courses within 10 miles. The casino offers over 1,100 slot machines including the state-of-the-art Monopoly, Reel'em In, and Wheel of Fortune machines. The casino also has over 25 table games, including Let it Ride, Roulette, Craps, Pai-gow and 21. The AVI Casino also has a sports book, keno lounge and a bingo hall.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 199
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Hero Gaming

Triq l-Uqija, Swieqi, MT, SWQ 2335
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Hero Gaming was founded in 2013 by Georg Westin, who was at the forefront of offering gamified casinos - a unique experience which players had not previously seen. Casino Heroes was launched in 2014 with an initial focus on Scandinavian countries. Throughout the past few years, our multi-brand strategy grew to include the launch of a number of new brands to our ever-growing portfolio, aimed at providing the best experience for our players. The speed at which these brands went to market is a reflection of the passion for innovation and agility which in turn enabled us to reap great benefits for the business and for our Heroes. We’re now thrilled to embark on our next adventure where we’re daring to dream to take Hero Gaming to a global level. The humble and truly passionate team behind our brands not only come up with new and creative ideas, but also have a great track record in executing projects with agility. Thanks to our great team, Hero Gaming has become one of the industry’s most reputable companies.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 48
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/avi-resort-&-casino.jpeg
Avi Resort & Casino
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hero-gaming.jpeg
Hero Gaming
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Avi Resort & Casino
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Hero Gaming
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Avi Resort & Casino in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hero Gaming in 2025.

Incident History — Avi Resort & Casino (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Avi Resort & Casino cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Hero Gaming (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hero Gaming cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/avi-resort-&-casino.jpeg
Avi Resort & Casino
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hero-gaming.jpeg
Hero Gaming
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Avi Resort & Casino company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Hero Gaming company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Hero Gaming company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Avi Resort & Casino company.

In the current year, Hero Gaming company and Avi Resort & Casino company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Hero Gaming company nor Avi Resort & Casino company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Hero Gaming company nor Avi Resort & Casino company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Hero Gaming company nor Avi Resort & Casino company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Avi Resort & Casino company nor Hero Gaming company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Avi Resort & Casino nor Hero Gaming holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Hero Gaming company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Avi Resort & Casino company.

Avi Resort & Casino company employs more people globally than Hero Gaming company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Avi Resort & Casino nor Hero Gaming holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Avi Resort & Casino nor Hero Gaming holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Avi Resort & Casino nor Hero Gaming holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Avi Resort & Casino nor Hero Gaming holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Avi Resort & Casino nor Hero Gaming holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Avi Resort & Casino nor Hero Gaming holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H