Comparison Overview

Avensure Ltd

VS

Joseph James Law

Avensure Ltd

11 Peter Street, Manchester, England, undefined, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Avensure is one of the leading service providers assisting a multitude of companies with the Health & Safety, HR, and Employment Law requirements ensuring that they are fully compliant with regulations. We can support our customers with devising solutions that offer advice & guidance, training to members of staff, creating preventative solutions, as well as contractual implementation. Have a look at some of the Avensure reviews, and you will see that we offer our customers the security of ensuring that they are fully compliant with legislation covering Health & Safety, Employment Law, and HR. To be able to provide our customers with the highest level of support, we ensure that our staff go through continuous training to make sure that they have all the knowledge and skills needed to provide the very best service. We use both the Avensure reviews and complaints to fine-tune our services, taking on board customers comments to tweak our service and continuously improve. If you look at the Avensure reviews, you will see that many customers value our service and give it a very high rating. When we do receive Avensure complaints or compliments, we use these as a tool to refine our service and improve it to excel our customer’s expectations. When you lack the knowledge of critical areas in your business such as HR, Employment Law, and Health & Safety, you are putting your business at risk. Avensure is the company that you can rely on to fill these gaps and ensure that your business is fully compliant with all necessary regulations, giving you peace of mind. An Avensure comparison between other companies providing a similar service will show that we are thought of highly in our industry by both our competitors, as well as our customers. If you are looking to ensure that your company is compliant, or need assistance with HR, Health & Safety, or Employment Law, Avensure is the company you can trust to get the job done right!

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 129
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Joseph James Law

Challenge House, Milton Keynes, Milton Keynes, MK3 6DP, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Joseph James Law is the brain child of leading Solicitor-Advocate Andrew Joseph James Settle after reaching the conclusion that legal services had become unnecessarily expensive, burdensome and complex. Andrew’s philosophy to legal services is to simplify and breakdown client concerns and resolve them to obtain the best available result for his clients. The practice is trustworthy, professional and forward thinking, whilst respecting the traditions of the profession. We have invested heavily in technology and innovative tools to enable us to deliver an exceptional service at below market rates. Legal services have evolved and Joseph James Law is pioneering the future of the profession. Joseph James Law offers a range of services: Commercial Litigation, Debt Recovery, Insolvency, Human Resources Management, Employment Law, Dispute Resolution, Commercial Law, Professional Negligence, Plevin/Banking Litigation, Sports & Media Law, and Medical Negligence. Clinical & Medical Negligence Department: Helen Donaghy is the Head of our Medical Negligence Department, based within our Leeds office. Helen is a member of the Law Society Clinical Negligence Accreditation Scheme and the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL). Before qualifying as a solicitor, Helen worked as a Registered General Nurse with a background in accident and emergency medicine. Helen now specialises in medical law and acts exclusively for those that have suffered life changing injury as a result of medical treatment. Helen deals with all types of clinical negligence and helps people to recover compensation to aid their recovery, and also provides support for both themselves and their family beyond the claims process.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/avensure-ltd.jpeg
Avensure Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/joseph-james-law.jpeg
Joseph James Law
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Avensure Ltd
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Joseph James Law
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Avensure Ltd in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Joseph James Law in 2025.

Incident History — Avensure Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Avensure Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Joseph James Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Joseph James Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/avensure-ltd.jpeg
Avensure Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/joseph-james-law.jpeg
Joseph James Law
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Avensure Ltd company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Joseph James Law company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Joseph James Law company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Avensure Ltd company.

In the current year, Joseph James Law company and Avensure Ltd company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Joseph James Law company nor Avensure Ltd company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Joseph James Law company nor Avensure Ltd company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Joseph James Law company nor Avensure Ltd company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Avensure Ltd company nor Joseph James Law company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Avensure Ltd nor Joseph James Law holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Joseph James Law company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Avensure Ltd company.

Avensure Ltd company employs more people globally than Joseph James Law company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Avensure Ltd nor Joseph James Law holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Avensure Ltd nor Joseph James Law holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Avensure Ltd nor Joseph James Law holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Avensure Ltd nor Joseph James Law holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Avensure Ltd nor Joseph James Law holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Avensure Ltd nor Joseph James Law holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X