Comparison Overview

Avastor

VS

TempGP Engineering

Avastor

30269, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Avastor Inc is one of the fastest growing companies supplying digital storage solutions to audio/video professionals. Our blend of informal corporate culture, coupled with an intense desire to satisfy the needs of our customers, has resulted in a blue-ribbon list of satisfied users, both domestic and international. Founded in early 2005, Avastor is headquartered in North America and has developing operations in Europe and South America. We offer the industry's most comprehensive line of external hard disk products, including over 20 configurations of drive interfaces and capacities for virtually every application required.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

TempGP Engineering

1670 Sheepshead Bay Road, Brooklyn, New York, 11235, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

TempGP Engineering is a design studio specializing in development of custom products and prototypes including electronics engineering and software development. We provided full spectrum of services and can deliver almost any engineering jobs. For most of electronics projects we will do actual electronics PCB boards, program chips with custom firmware, and manufacture enclosure. For most cases we use Microchip PIC or Atmel AVR series MCU or various ARM and DSP chips. Aside from hardcore electronics we are capable to deliver mechanical engineering projects, arts and aesthetics, architectural and 3D related projects. We have in-house machinery to deliver onsite rapid prototyping.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Avastor
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tempgp-engineering.jpeg
TempGP Engineering
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Avastor
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
TempGP Engineering
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Avastor in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TempGP Engineering in 2025.

Incident History — Avastor (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Avastor cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — TempGP Engineering (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TempGP Engineering cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Avastor
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tempgp-engineering.jpeg
TempGP Engineering
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Avastor company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to TempGP Engineering company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, TempGP Engineering company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Avastor company.

In the current year, TempGP Engineering company and Avastor company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither TempGP Engineering company nor Avastor company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither TempGP Engineering company nor Avastor company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither TempGP Engineering company nor Avastor company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Avastor company nor TempGP Engineering company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Avastor nor TempGP Engineering holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Avastor company nor TempGP Engineering company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Both Avastor company and TempGP Engineering company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither Avastor nor TempGP Engineering holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Avastor nor TempGP Engineering holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Avastor nor TempGP Engineering holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Avastor nor TempGP Engineering holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Avastor nor TempGP Engineering holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Avastor nor TempGP Engineering holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H