Comparison Overview

Avansic, Inc.

VS

Enyo Lawyers

Avansic, Inc.

undefined, All Over , undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

We are a leading provider of full-service ESI processing, digital forensics, online review, managed services, and expert services. We are committed to stellar customer service. We provide fair and simple pricing. We are true computer scientists and take a scientific approach to ESI processing. We employ thought leaders and experts in the field of e-discovery.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Enyo Lawyers

26 Market St, Brisbane CBD, Queensland, 4000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Enyo Lawyers is a leading boutique firm with offices in Brisbane, Gold Coast and Melbourne. We focus on the delivery of efficient outcomes for our clients and we are extremely proud of our track record. Enyo Lawyers specialises in the following areas of law: 1. Litigation and dispute resolution; 2. Insolvency, bankruptcy and debt collection; 3. Property; and 4. Commercial and Corporate Law. At Enyo Lawyers we seek to be on the cutting edge of efficiencies and technology, so we can deliver more for less. We use technology to minimise overheads and waste (including having a paperless office) which allows us to deliver fast, effective solutions of a top tier quality for a fraction of the price. Getting the right lawyer isn’t easy, but it’s worth it. Call us on (07) 3180 0510 or email [email protected]

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/avansic-inc..jpeg
Avansic, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/enyolawyers.jpeg
Enyo Lawyers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Avansic, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Enyo Lawyers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Avansic, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Enyo Lawyers in 2025.

Incident History — Avansic, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Avansic, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Enyo Lawyers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Enyo Lawyers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/avansic-inc..jpeg
Avansic, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/enyolawyers.jpeg
Enyo Lawyers
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Enyo Lawyers company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Avansic, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Enyo Lawyers company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Avansic, Inc. company.

In the current year, Enyo Lawyers company and Avansic, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Enyo Lawyers company nor Avansic, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Enyo Lawyers company nor Avansic, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Enyo Lawyers company nor Avansic, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Avansic, Inc. company nor Enyo Lawyers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Avansic, Inc. nor Enyo Lawyers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Avansic, Inc. company nor Enyo Lawyers company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Avansic, Inc. company employs more people globally than Enyo Lawyers company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Avansic, Inc. nor Enyo Lawyers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Avansic, Inc. nor Enyo Lawyers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Avansic, Inc. nor Enyo Lawyers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Avansic, Inc. nor Enyo Lawyers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Avansic, Inc. nor Enyo Lawyers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Avansic, Inc. nor Enyo Lawyers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X