Comparison Overview

Avanade

VS

ASGN Incorporated

Avanade

1191 2nd Ave, Seattle, Washington, US, 98101
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

Avanade is the world’s leading expert on Microsoft. Trusted by over 7,000 clients worldwide, we deliver AI-driven solutions that unlock the full potential of people and technology, optimize operations, foster innovation and drive growth. As Microsoft’s Global SI Partner we combine global scale with local expertise in AI, cloud, data analytics, cybersecurity, and ERP to design solutions that prioritize people and drive meaningful impact. We champion diversity, inclusion, and sustainability, ensuring our work benefits society and business.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 17,243
Subsidiaries: 16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ASGN Incorporated

4400 Cox Road Suite 100, Glen Allen, Virginia, US, 23060
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

ASGN Incorporated (NYSE: ASGN) is a leading provider of IT services and solutions across the commercial and government sectors. ASGN helps corporate enterprises and government organizations develop, implement and operate critical IT and business solutions through its integrated offerings. For more information, please visit asgn.com. *Please note: Our company does not use the Telegram app, Google Hangouts, or communicate using non-corporate email account addresses. For more about what we do and do not ask for in the hiring process, please visit: https://www.asgn.com/fraud-alert

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 19,680
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/avanade.jpeg
Avanade
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/asgn-incorporated.jpeg
ASGN Incorporated
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Avanade
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ASGN Incorporated
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Avanade in 2025.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ASGN Incorporated in 2025.

Incident History — Avanade (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Avanade cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ASGN Incorporated (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ASGN Incorporated cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/avanade.jpeg
Avanade
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/asgn-incorporated.jpeg
ASGN Incorporated
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2020
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: External Hacking
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Avanade company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ASGN Incorporated company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

ASGN Incorporated company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Avanade company has not reported any.

In the current year, ASGN Incorporated company and Avanade company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ASGN Incorporated company nor Avanade company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

ASGN Incorporated company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Avanade company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither ASGN Incorporated company nor Avanade company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Avanade company nor ASGN Incorporated company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Avanade nor ASGN Incorporated holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Avanade company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to ASGN Incorporated company.

ASGN Incorporated company employs more people globally than Avanade company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither Avanade nor ASGN Incorporated holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Avanade nor ASGN Incorporated holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Avanade nor ASGN Incorporated holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Avanade nor ASGN Incorporated holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Avanade nor ASGN Incorporated holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Avanade nor ASGN Incorporated holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H