Comparison Overview

AVA Billing and Consulting

VS

Leyden Family Service & Mental Health Center

AVA Billing and Consulting

3146 Red Hill Suite 120, Costa Mesa, California, 92626, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

In 2023, Ava Billing became part of Medusind, a leading national provider of medical and dental RCM services with over 20 years of experience. Over 30,000 healthcare providers across 50+ specialties leverage Medusind's expertise, advanced technology, and robust operations to remove barriers to practice growth and accelerate profitability. Among the specialties Medusind focuses on are behavioral health, Federal Qualified Health Centers (FQHC), anesthesia, pathology, emergency departments, dermatology and ophthalmology. Below is a brief summary of the benefits of using the Company’s services: • Reduced administrative costs for clients • Reduction in accounts receivable aging summaries • Extremely fast processing of claims • Diligent denials and claim disputes • More Accurate forecasting of insurance changes • Utilization Review and Training for clinical staff • Compliance and Accreditation consulting • Sales and Admissions Consulting • Clinical consulting

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Leyden Family Service & Mental Health Center

10001 Grand Ave, Franklin Park, IL, 60131, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Leyden Family Services provides a variety of counseling, treatment, and preventative services for children, adolescents, adults, senior citizens, and families. Furthermore, our services extend to people with many different types of needs. We support people who are suffering from temporary disruptions in their lives due to life changes, stresses, and traumas. We treat individuals with alcohol, substance abuse, and/or gambling problems. Our staff serves clients with serious and persistent mental illness as well as those having difficulties associated with aging. Leyden Family Services also provides community education targeted toward life enhancement.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 69
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ava-billing-and-consulting.jpeg
AVA Billing and Consulting
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/leyden-family-service-&-mental-health-center.jpeg
Leyden Family Service & Mental Health Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
AVA Billing and Consulting
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Leyden Family Service & Mental Health Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AVA Billing and Consulting in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Leyden Family Service & Mental Health Center in 2026.

Incident History — AVA Billing and Consulting (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AVA Billing and Consulting cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Leyden Family Service & Mental Health Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Leyden Family Service & Mental Health Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ava-billing-and-consulting.jpeg
AVA Billing and Consulting
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/leyden-family-service-&-mental-health-center.jpeg
Leyden Family Service & Mental Health Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Leyden Family Service & Mental Health Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to AVA Billing and Consulting company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

AVA Billing and Consulting company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Leyden Family Service & Mental Health Center company has not reported any.

In the current year, Leyden Family Service & Mental Health Center company and AVA Billing and Consulting company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Leyden Family Service & Mental Health Center company nor AVA Billing and Consulting company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

AVA Billing and Consulting company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Leyden Family Service & Mental Health Center company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Leyden Family Service & Mental Health Center company nor AVA Billing and Consulting company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither AVA Billing and Consulting company nor Leyden Family Service & Mental Health Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither AVA Billing and Consulting nor Leyden Family Service & Mental Health Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

AVA Billing and Consulting company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Leyden Family Service & Mental Health Center company.

Leyden Family Service & Mental Health Center company employs more people globally than AVA Billing and Consulting company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither AVA Billing and Consulting nor Leyden Family Service & Mental Health Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither AVA Billing and Consulting nor Leyden Family Service & Mental Health Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither AVA Billing and Consulting nor Leyden Family Service & Mental Health Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither AVA Billing and Consulting nor Leyden Family Service & Mental Health Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither AVA Billing and Consulting nor Leyden Family Service & Mental Health Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither AVA Billing and Consulting nor Leyden Family Service & Mental Health Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N