Comparison Overview

AutoProtect

VS

Ford Motor Company

AutoProtect

Warwick House, Harlow, Essex, CM19 5DY, GB
Last Update: 2025-03-10 (UTC)
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.autoprotect.co.uk

AutoProtect Group are the commercial partner for automotive retailers. We bring together award-winning insurances, warranties and value-added products, specialist compliance services, efficiency driving F&I software and market-leading cosmetic repair for the automotive market. - Car protection solutions: award winning warranties, insurances and other value-added products from AutoProtect. - Automotive compliance services: advice, training and appointed representative network from iComply. - F&I software: connect your lender panel in one place and keep track of your VAPs and compliance trails with DealTrak. - Cosmetic damage repair: delight your customers with a market leading driveway repair service when you offer our cosmetic damage products with Shine! Our retail and dealership partners offer their customers award-winning products created by a brand they trust. Hundreds of thousands of drivers across the UK and Europe are protected by our products. We're proud to hold an ‘Excellent’ rating on Trustpilot, from over 11,000 verified reviews.

NAICS: 336
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 206
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Ford Motor Company

None, None, Dearborn, Michigan, US, None
Last Update: 2025-08-28 (UTC)
Between 800 and 849
https://corporate.ford.com/careers

We don't just make history -- we make the future. Ford put the world on wheels over a century ago, and our teams are re-inventing icons and creating groundbreaking connected and electric vehicles for the next century. We believe in serving our customers, our communities, and the world. If you do, too, come move the world and make the future with us. Ford is a global company with shared ideals and a deep sense of family. From our earliest days as a pioneer of modern transportation, we have sought to make the world a better place – one that benefits lives, communities and the planet. We are here to provide the means for every person to move and pursue their dreams, serving as a bridge between personal freedom and the future of mobility. In that pursuit, our 186,000 employees around the world help to set the pace of innovation every day. Privacy Policy: https://www.ford.com/help/privacy/

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 143,957
Subsidiaries: 35
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/autoprotect.jpeg
AutoProtect
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ford-motor-company.jpeg
Ford Motor Company
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
AutoProtect
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ford Motor Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AutoProtect in 2025.

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

Ford Motor Company has 132.56% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — AutoProtect (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AutoProtect cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ford Motor Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ford Motor Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/autoprotect.jpeg
AutoProtect
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ford-motor-company.jpeg
Ford Motor Company
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Ford Motor Company company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to AutoProtect company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Ford Motor Company company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas AutoProtect company has not reported any.

In the current year, Ford Motor Company company has reported more cyber incidents than AutoProtect company.

Neither Ford Motor Company company nor AutoProtect company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Ford Motor Company company nor AutoProtect company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Ford Motor Company company nor AutoProtect company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Ford Motor Company company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while AutoProtect company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither AutoProtect nor Ford Motor Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Ford Motor Company company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to AutoProtect company.

Ford Motor Company company employs more people globally than AutoProtect company, reflecting its scale as a Motor Vehicle Manufacturing.

Neither AutoProtect nor Ford Motor Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither AutoProtect nor Ford Motor Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither AutoProtect nor Ford Motor Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither AutoProtect nor Ford Motor Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither AutoProtect nor Ford Motor Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither AutoProtect nor Ford Motor Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

The Bold Page Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the ‘percentage’ parameter in all versions up to, and including, 5.4.5 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.

Published
Date
2025-10-23
Updated
Date
2025-10-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

The ComboServlet in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.111, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.2, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.5, 7.4 GA through update 92, 7.3 GA through update 35, and older unsupported versions does not limit the number or size of the files it will combine, which allows remote attackers to create very large responses that lead to a denial of service attack via the URL query string.

Published
Date
2025-10-23
Updated
Date
2025-10-23
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A relative path traversal vulnerability was discovered in Productivity Suite software version 4.4.1.19. The vulnerability allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to interact with the ProductivityService PLC simulator and delete arbitrary directories on the target machine.

Published
Date
2025-10-23
Updated
Date
2025-10-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A relative path traversal vulnerability was discovered in Productivity Suite software version 4.4.1.19. The vulnerability allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to interact with the ProductivityService PLC simulator and create arbitrary directories on the target machine.

Published
Date
2025-10-23
Updated
Date
2025-10-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A relative path traversal vulnerability was discovered in Productivity Suite software version 4.4.1.19. The vulnerability allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to interact with the ProductivityService PLC simulator and delete arbitrary files on the target machine.

Published
Date
2025-10-23
Updated
Date
2025-10-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:H/SC:N/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References