Comparison Overview

AutoProtect

VS

Ferrari

AutoProtect

Warwick House, Harlow, Essex, CM19 5DY, GB
Last Update: 2025-03-10 (UTC)
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.autoprotect.co.uk

AutoProtect Group are the commercial partner for automotive retailers. We bring together award-winning insurances, warranties and value-added products, specialist compliance services, efficiency driving F&I software and market-leading cosmetic repair for the automotive market. - Car protection solutions: award winning warranties, insurances and other value-added products from AutoProtect. - Automotive compliance services: advice, training and appointed representative network from iComply. - F&I software: connect your lender panel in one place and keep track of your VAPs and compliance trails with DealTrak. - Cosmetic damage repair: delight your customers with a market leading driveway repair service when you offer our cosmetic damage products with Shine! Our retail and dealership partners offer their customers award-winning products created by a brand they trust. Hundreds of thousands of drivers across the UK and Europe are protected by our products. We're proud to hold an ‘Excellent’ rating on Trustpilot, from over 11,000 verified reviews.

NAICS: 336
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 206
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Ferrari

Abetone inferiore, Maranello, MO, 41053, IT
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)
Between 700 and 749
http://www.ferrari.com

Ferrari's story officially began in 1947 when its first road car, the 125 S, emerged from the gate of no. 4 Via Abetone Inferiore in Maranello. The iconic two-seater went on to win the Rome Grand Prix later that year and shortly thereafter was developed into a refined GT roadster. The company has travelled a long way since then, but its mission has remained unaltered: to make unique sports cars that represent the finest in Italian design and craftsmanship, both on the track and on the road. The very definition of excellence and sportiness, Ferrari needs no introduction. Its principal calling card is the numerous Formula One titles it has won: a total of 16 constructors’ championships and 15 drivers’ championships. And of course, there is the impressive lineup of legendary GT models. Cars that are unique for their design, technology and luxurious styling and that represent the best in Italian the world over.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 11,884
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/autoprotect.jpeg
AutoProtect
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ferrari.jpeg
Ferrari
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
AutoProtect
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ferrari
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AutoProtect in 2025.

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ferrari in 2025.

Incident History — AutoProtect (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AutoProtect cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ferrari (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ferrari cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/autoprotect.jpeg
AutoProtect
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ferrari.jpeg
Ferrari
Incidents

Date Detected: 03/2023
Type:Breach
Motivation: Financial gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 03/2023
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2022
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Data theft and ransom
Blog: Blog

FAQ

AutoProtect company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ferrari company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Ferrari company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas AutoProtect company has not reported any.

In the current year, Ferrari company and AutoProtect company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Ferrari company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while AutoProtect company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Ferrari company has disclosed at least one data breach, while AutoProtect company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Ferrari company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while AutoProtect company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither AutoProtect company nor Ferrari company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither AutoProtect nor Ferrari holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Ferrari company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to AutoProtect company.

Ferrari company employs more people globally than AutoProtect company, reflecting its scale as a Motor Vehicle Manufacturing.

Neither AutoProtect nor Ferrari holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither AutoProtect nor Ferrari holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither AutoProtect nor Ferrari holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither AutoProtect nor Ferrari holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither AutoProtect nor Ferrari holds HIPAA certification.

Neither AutoProtect nor Ferrari holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

The Bold Page Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the ‘percentage’ parameter in all versions up to, and including, 5.4.5 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.

Published
Date
2025-10-23
Updated
Date
2025-10-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

The ComboServlet in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.111, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.2, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.5, 7.4 GA through update 92, 7.3 GA through update 35, and older unsupported versions does not limit the number or size of the files it will combine, which allows remote attackers to create very large responses that lead to a denial of service attack via the URL query string.

Published
Date
2025-10-23
Updated
Date
2025-10-23
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A relative path traversal vulnerability was discovered in Productivity Suite software version 4.4.1.19. The vulnerability allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to interact with the ProductivityService PLC simulator and delete arbitrary directories on the target machine.

Published
Date
2025-10-23
Updated
Date
2025-10-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A relative path traversal vulnerability was discovered in Productivity Suite software version 4.4.1.19. The vulnerability allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to interact with the ProductivityService PLC simulator and create arbitrary directories on the target machine.

Published
Date
2025-10-23
Updated
Date
2025-10-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A relative path traversal vulnerability was discovered in Productivity Suite software version 4.4.1.19. The vulnerability allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to interact with the ProductivityService PLC simulator and delete arbitrary files on the target machine.

Published
Date
2025-10-23
Updated
Date
2025-10-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:H/SC:N/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References