Comparison Overview

Automation & Control Concepts

VS

Best Technology Inc.

Automation & Control Concepts

100 North Broadway, Saint Louis, MO, 63102, US
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 750 and 799

ACC employs over 50 engineers with extensive systems integration experience in the areas of electrical design, PLC programming, HMI/SCADA design, MES data collection and analysis. ACC's skilled employees apply their years of experience in the field to provide clients with structured, standardized and maintainable systems. The result for the client is a reliable system that satisfies requirements and accommodates expansion. ACC is highly recognized Systems Integrators in the Midwest for their Intellution, Wonderware, Allen-Bradley/Rockwell, Parsec TrakSYS, Microsoft Technologies and Modicon PLCs software capabilities and their experience in the continuous process control, batching, and packaging fields. We offer a creative, fun team working environment with competitive salaries, flexible work schedule, substantial 401K contribution independent of individual contribution, profit sharing and an outstanding benefits package. ACC is conveniently located in the heart of downtown, with excellent highway access and paid covered parking.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 55
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Best Technology Inc.

14040 23rd Ave N, Minneapolis, MN, 55447, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Let’s make sure we’re on the same page. You’re navigating the real threat of supply chain disruption with the 3M™ Novec™ phase-out. You’re being forced to pivot quickly to keep operations running smoothly. Every product transition demands seamless integration. One incompatible solution can create costly bottlenecks, downtime, and missed deadlines. You need alternative solutions that won’t disrupt your current processes or require months of revalidation, keeping production on track without sacrificing performance. Plus, you’ve got to find replacements without blowing your budget. It’s a lot to juggle, isn’t it? We see you, which is why we offer tailored solutions to address these critical issues. Our BestSolv™ Engineered Fluids provide drop-in replacements for 3M™ Novec™ fluids, ensuring smooth transitions without requiring new equipment. They’re why we’re rated #1 in 3M™ Novec™ fluid replacement. Plus, we offer materials testing support to help you navigate the complexities of industrial cleaning chemistry. Our custom equipment solutions are designed to fit seamlessly with your existing systems, minimizing downtime and avoiding costly upgrades. We prioritize cost efficiency, providing products that offer up to 50% savings over other alternatives while maintaining productivity. And we also offer environmentally safe options, including PFAS-free and low global warming potential products, helping you meet sustainability goals and adhere to the latest environmental standards. We are committed to providing the right solutions to keep your operations running smoothly, safely, and cost-effectively. It’s why our customers say things like, “When we call someone picks up the phone with critical information needed for the products we purchase.” Need to talk about a drop-in replacement to replace your 3M™ Novec™ fluids? Click https://bestsolv.com/3m-novec-replacements/ Or call or email us! ☎ 612-238-2300 📧 [email protected]

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/automation-&-control-concepts.jpeg
Automation & Control Concepts
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/best-technology-inc.jpeg
Best Technology Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Automation & Control Concepts
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Best Technology Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Automation & Control Concepts in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Best Technology Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Automation & Control Concepts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Automation & Control Concepts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Best Technology Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Best Technology Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/automation-&-control-concepts.jpeg
Automation & Control Concepts
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/best-technology-inc.jpeg
Best Technology Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Automation & Control Concepts company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Best Technology Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Best Technology Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Automation & Control Concepts company.

In the current year, Best Technology Inc. company and Automation & Control Concepts company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Best Technology Inc. company nor Automation & Control Concepts company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Best Technology Inc. company nor Automation & Control Concepts company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Best Technology Inc. company nor Automation & Control Concepts company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Automation & Control Concepts company nor Best Technology Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Automation & Control Concepts nor Best Technology Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Automation & Control Concepts company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Best Technology Inc. company.

Automation & Control Concepts company employs more people globally than Best Technology Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither Automation & Control Concepts nor Best Technology Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Automation & Control Concepts nor Best Technology Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Automation & Control Concepts nor Best Technology Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Automation & Control Concepts nor Best Technology Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Automation & Control Concepts nor Best Technology Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Automation & Control Concepts nor Best Technology Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H