Comparison Overview

Autografia Editora

VS

InDaily

Autografia Editora

None
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

Na Autografia somos apaixonados por livros. A Autografia nasceu da percepção de que todos os dias novas obras são criadas e merecem sim ganhar as páginas de um livro. Para nós, cada obra é única, todos os autores são especiais. Somos ágeis e eficientes em atendê-lo(a) oferecendo serviços de alta qualidade. Trabalhamos com obras de Romances, poesias, trabalhos acadêmicos na mais diversas área do ensino e coletâneas.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 52
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

InDaily

165 Grenfell St, Adelaide, South Australia, 5000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

InDaily is South Australia’s only locally owned, independent source of digital news. Need to know what’s really happening in Adelaide? Go to InDaily for up-to-date news, opinion, business, sport, arts & culture, food & wine, real-estate, design and events. Read us on web, mobile, tablet – and follow us on social media for informed, sophisticated news about all this city and state has to offer.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Autografia Editora
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/solstice-media.jpeg
InDaily
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Autografia Editora
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
InDaily
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Autografia Editora in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for InDaily in 2025.

Incident History — Autografia Editora (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Autografia Editora cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — InDaily (X = Date, Y = Severity)

InDaily cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Autografia Editora
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/solstice-media.jpeg
InDaily
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Autografia Editora company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to InDaily company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, InDaily company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Autografia Editora company.

In the current year, InDaily company and Autografia Editora company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither InDaily company nor Autografia Editora company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither InDaily company nor Autografia Editora company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither InDaily company nor Autografia Editora company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Autografia Editora company nor InDaily company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Autografia Editora nor InDaily holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Autografia Editora company nor InDaily company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Autografia Editora company employs more people globally than InDaily company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Autografia Editora nor InDaily holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Autografia Editora nor InDaily holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Autografia Editora nor InDaily holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Autografia Editora nor InDaily holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Autografia Editora nor InDaily holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Autografia Editora nor InDaily holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.