Comparison Overview

Autocall Fire Detection Systems

VS

Veolia Water Technologies Netherlands

Autocall Fire Detection Systems

Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Backed by a legacy of innovation and invention, Autocall fire detection products are moving the industry forward with advanced technology that helps ensure protection for people and facilities worldwide. Cost-effective Autocall systems are easy to install and simple to operate – because no one should ever have to compromise on safety. With advanced capabilities and adaptive, flexible design, Autocall systems go above and beyond to deliver steadfast protection day after day, year after year.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
3

Veolia Water Technologies Netherlands

Celsiusstraat 34, Ede, undefined, 6716 BZ, NL
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Veolia Water Technologies Netherlands ontwerpt, levert, installeert en onderhoudt waterbehandelingsinstallaties. Wij beschikken over 350 verschillende waterbehandelingstechnieken, die we toepassen in producten en diensten voor water- en proceswaterbehandeling. Veolia Water Technologies Netherlands is een onderdeel van de wereldwijd vertegenwoordigde Veolia groep. Klanten vragen allerlei waterkwaliteiten. Van laboratorium tot gezondheidszorg en van chemische industrie tot de voedingsmiddelenindustrie. Wij beloven hen maximale kwaliteit, betrouwbare continuïteit en beschikbare capaciteit. In nauwe samenwerking met klanten hebben we voor iedere situatie een oplossing. Van ontwerp tot servicecontract tot mobiele installatie. Kostenefficiënt en passend bij geldende wet- en regelgeving. We know water. Een natuurlijke hulpbron waar we met elkaar zuinig op moeten zijn. Daarom ligt de focus van Veolia op duurzaam en efficiënt gebruik van water. Onze missie? Resourcing the world.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 69
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/autocall-fire-detection-systems.jpeg
Autocall Fire Detection Systems
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/veoliawatertechnologiesnl.jpeg
Veolia Water Technologies Netherlands
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Autocall Fire Detection Systems
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Veolia Water Technologies Netherlands
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Autocall Fire Detection Systems in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Veolia Water Technologies Netherlands in 2025.

Incident History — Autocall Fire Detection Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Autocall Fire Detection Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Veolia Water Technologies Netherlands (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Veolia Water Technologies Netherlands cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/autocall-fire-detection-systems.jpeg
Autocall Fire Detection Systems
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Publicly Accessible Devices, Default Credentials, Unpatched Software Vulnerabilities, Lack of Firewalls/Encryption
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 09/2023
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Denial of Service (DoS)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 09/2023
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/veoliawatertechnologiesnl.jpeg
Veolia Water Technologies Netherlands
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Veolia Water Technologies Netherlands company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Autocall Fire Detection Systems company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Autocall Fire Detection Systems company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Veolia Water Technologies Netherlands company has not reported any.

In the current year, Autocall Fire Detection Systems company has reported more cyber incidents than Veolia Water Technologies Netherlands company.

Autocall Fire Detection Systems company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Veolia Water Technologies Netherlands company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Veolia Water Technologies Netherlands company nor Autocall Fire Detection Systems company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Autocall Fire Detection Systems company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Veolia Water Technologies Netherlands company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Autocall Fire Detection Systems company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Veolia Water Technologies Netherlands company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Autocall Fire Detection Systems nor Veolia Water Technologies Netherlands holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Veolia Water Technologies Netherlands company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Autocall Fire Detection Systems company.

Veolia Water Technologies Netherlands company employs more people globally than Autocall Fire Detection Systems company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Autocall Fire Detection Systems nor Veolia Water Technologies Netherlands holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Autocall Fire Detection Systems nor Veolia Water Technologies Netherlands holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Autocall Fire Detection Systems nor Veolia Water Technologies Netherlands holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Autocall Fire Detection Systems nor Veolia Water Technologies Netherlands holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Autocall Fire Detection Systems nor Veolia Water Technologies Netherlands holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Autocall Fire Detection Systems nor Veolia Water Technologies Netherlands holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H