Comparison Overview

Autocall Fire Detection Systems

VS

Mid-States Aluminum Corp.

Autocall Fire Detection Systems

Last Update: 2025-11-28
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.autocall.com

Backed by a legacy of innovation and invention, Autocall fire detection products are moving the industry forward with advanced technology that helps ensure protection for people and facilities worldwide. Cost-effective Autocall systems are easy to install and simple to operate – because no one should ever have to compromise on safety. With advanced capabilities and adaptive, flexible design, Autocall systems go above and beyond to deliver steadfast protection day after day, year after year.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
3
View Profile

Mid-States Aluminum Corp.

132 Trowbridge Drive P.O. Box 1107, Fond du lac, WI, 54936-1107, US
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 750 and 799
http://www.midstal.com

Mid-States Aluminum Corp. operates from a 290,000 square foot modern facility. The facility was expanded in 2019 to include 39,000 additional square feet and a new, state-of-the-art extrusion press. Mid-States Aluminum is a vertically-integrated manufacturer of custom aluminum extrusions with machining and forming capabilities as well as in-house anodizing. We service low and high volume customers. Our associates are engaged and work as a team to provide quality products and world-class customer service. Mid-States serves the transportation, building and construction, electrical and electronics, mechanical equipment, agriculture, medical and consumer industries. We are ISO 9001:2015 certified. To understand what makes Mid-States Aluminum truly different, consider our customers — both internal and external. Our external customers are designers and manufacturers. We provide them with extrusion design advise and manufacturing process optimization. Our creative ideas and fresh thinking yield high efficiency and high quality products. Our internal customers include our management team, a group of entrepreneurs who have a passion for doing great work and inspiring others — from the floor to administrative support — to do the same. It’s experienced engineers who’ve spent years looking for a company that would respect their experience and would be able to challenge them daily. And, it’s new team members who bring with them a desire to learn and contribute, and who are able to share new ideas every day.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 91
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/autocall-fire-detection-systems.jpeg
Autocall Fire Detection Systems
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mid-states-aluminum-corp..jpeg
Mid-States Aluminum Corp.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Autocall Fire Detection Systems
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mid-States Aluminum Corp.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Autocall Fire Detection Systems in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mid-States Aluminum Corp. in 2025.

Incident History — Autocall Fire Detection Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Autocall Fire Detection Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Mid-States Aluminum Corp. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mid-States Aluminum Corp. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/autocall-fire-detection-systems.jpeg
Autocall Fire Detection Systems
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Publicly Accessible Devices, Default Credentials, Unpatched Software Vulnerabilities, Lack of Firewalls/Encryption
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 09/2023
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Denial of Service (DoS)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 09/2023
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mid-states-aluminum-corp..jpeg
Mid-States Aluminum Corp.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Mid-States Aluminum Corp. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Autocall Fire Detection Systems company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Autocall Fire Detection Systems company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Mid-States Aluminum Corp. company has not reported any.

In the current year, Autocall Fire Detection Systems company has reported more cyber incidents than Mid-States Aluminum Corp. company.

Autocall Fire Detection Systems company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Mid-States Aluminum Corp. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Mid-States Aluminum Corp. company nor Autocall Fire Detection Systems company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Autocall Fire Detection Systems company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Mid-States Aluminum Corp. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Autocall Fire Detection Systems company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Mid-States Aluminum Corp. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Autocall Fire Detection Systems nor Mid-States Aluminum Corp. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Autocall Fire Detection Systems company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Mid-States Aluminum Corp. company.

Mid-States Aluminum Corp. company employs more people globally than Autocall Fire Detection Systems company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Autocall Fire Detection Systems nor Mid-States Aluminum Corp. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Autocall Fire Detection Systems nor Mid-States Aluminum Corp. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Autocall Fire Detection Systems nor Mid-States Aluminum Corp. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Autocall Fire Detection Systems nor Mid-States Aluminum Corp. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Autocall Fire Detection Systems nor Mid-States Aluminum Corp. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Autocall Fire Detection Systems nor Mid-States Aluminum Corp. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References