Comparison Overview

Autismepunt

VS

Therapeutic Center for Anxiety and Trauma

Autismepunt

Lupinestraat 14, Eindhoven, 5611 NV Eindhoven, NL
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Autismepunt is een kleine onderneming die volledig is gespecialiseerd in autisme en kwaliteit bovenaan de agenda heeft staan. Mensen met autisme verwerken informatie anders, hierdoor hebben ze specifieke talenten, maar het maakt hen ook kwetsbaar voor overbelasting, overprikkeling. In het werken met mensen met autisme komt daarom alles heel nauw. Elk individu heeft secuur afgestemd maatwerk nodig. Werken, wonen, relaties, alles moet, als het ware passen als een lederen handschoen. Door hun kwetsbaarheid zijn ze afhankelijker van hun omgeving. Als hulpverlener heb je in die zin een grote verantwoordelijkheid. Met een team van deskundige hulpverleners willen wij onze cliënten daadwerkelijk ondersteuning bieden. Autismepunt biedt het totale pakket van begeleiding, re-integratie, jobcoaching, begeleid wonen, diagnostiek en behandeling voor onze doelgroep.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 83
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Therapeutic Center for Anxiety and Trauma

2121 5th Avenue, San Diego, CA, 92101, US
Last Update: 2026-01-16

We are a private practice group located in the Banker's Hill area of San Diego. We provide services including individual, couple and family therapy and specialize in the reduction of symptoms associated with exposure to trauma and anxiety disorders. In addition to this service, we treat a variety of issues such as eating disorders, gender or sexual identify issues, mood disorders, development of self-esteem, meditation and mindfulness, art therapy, play therapy for children and food/body related difficulties. Many in our group of clinicians are also trained in EMDR, which has been well researched and shown to decrease symptoms of PTSD including flashbacks, disturbing memories and the anxiety associated with those. We are dedicated to providing a safe, confidential and aesthetically appealing environment for people of all ages to heal.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/autismepunt.jpeg
Autismepunt
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/therapeutic-center-for-anxiety-and-trauma.jpeg
Therapeutic Center for Anxiety and Trauma
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Autismepunt
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Therapeutic Center for Anxiety and Trauma
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Autismepunt in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Therapeutic Center for Anxiety and Trauma in 2026.

Incident History — Autismepunt (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Autismepunt cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Therapeutic Center for Anxiety and Trauma (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Therapeutic Center for Anxiety and Trauma cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/autismepunt.jpeg
Autismepunt
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/therapeutic-center-for-anxiety-and-trauma.jpeg
Therapeutic Center for Anxiety and Trauma
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Autismepunt company and Therapeutic Center for Anxiety and Trauma company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Therapeutic Center for Anxiety and Trauma company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Autismepunt company.

In the current year, Therapeutic Center for Anxiety and Trauma company and Autismepunt company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Therapeutic Center for Anxiety and Trauma company nor Autismepunt company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Therapeutic Center for Anxiety and Trauma company nor Autismepunt company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Therapeutic Center for Anxiety and Trauma company nor Autismepunt company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Autismepunt company nor Therapeutic Center for Anxiety and Trauma company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Autismepunt nor Therapeutic Center for Anxiety and Trauma holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Autismepunt company nor Therapeutic Center for Anxiety and Trauma company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Autismepunt company employs more people globally than Therapeutic Center for Anxiety and Trauma company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Autismepunt nor Therapeutic Center for Anxiety and Trauma holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Autismepunt nor Therapeutic Center for Anxiety and Trauma holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Autismepunt nor Therapeutic Center for Anxiety and Trauma holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Autismepunt nor Therapeutic Center for Anxiety and Trauma holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Autismepunt nor Therapeutic Center for Anxiety and Trauma holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Autismepunt nor Therapeutic Center for Anxiety and Trauma holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N