Comparison Overview

Autism HOPE

VS

Psychologisch Centrum Lambertushof

Autism HOPE

S Olive Street, Media, 19063, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

With over 20 years of servicing children, youth and young adults adolescents in the field of education and mental/behavioral health, Autism Hope continues to be dedicated to excellence. We are vested in exemplary services, education and community outreach. Autism Hope is devoted to individualized treatment, with an inclusive approach and implementation of evidence-based practices.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Psychologisch Centrum Lambertushof

Stationsstraat 27a, Veghel, 5461 JS, NL
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Psychologisch Centrum Lambertushof Veghel draagt door behandeling en haar diensten en producten op het gebied van geestelijke gezondheid en welzijn bij aan een optimale kwaliteit van leven van haar cliënten. De dienstverlening is erop gericht de cliënt de regie over zijn/ haar eigen leven te laten houden of verbeteren. Als groepspraktijk dragen wij professionele zorg met elkaar. We bundelen onze expertise waardoor we cliënten meer behandelingsmogelijkheden kunnen bieden en delen onze kennis en ervaring in intervisies en multidisciplinair overleg. We werken vanuit een bio-psycho-sociaal model (holistisch): we integreren onze expertise met gezins- en familiesystemen, alsook met organisatie- en bedrijfssystemen. Samen Doen is in deze ook uitgaan van een holistische visie dat lichaam en geest echt één zijn. Ons logo is de Feniks. Wij behandelen om je te laten opstaan uit de as. Begeleiden je op je pad en lopen naast je. Wij coachen je om te leren vliegen.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 34
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/autism-hope.jpeg
Autism HOPE
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/psychologisch-centrum-lambertushof-veghel.jpeg
Psychologisch Centrum Lambertushof
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Autism HOPE
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Psychologisch Centrum Lambertushof
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Autism HOPE in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Psychologisch Centrum Lambertushof in 2026.

Incident History — Autism HOPE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Autism HOPE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Psychologisch Centrum Lambertushof (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Psychologisch Centrum Lambertushof cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/autism-hope.jpeg
Autism HOPE
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/psychologisch-centrum-lambertushof-veghel.jpeg
Psychologisch Centrum Lambertushof
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Autism HOPE company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Psychologisch Centrum Lambertushof company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Psychologisch Centrum Lambertushof company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Autism HOPE company.

In the current year, Psychologisch Centrum Lambertushof company and Autism HOPE company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Psychologisch Centrum Lambertushof company nor Autism HOPE company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Psychologisch Centrum Lambertushof company nor Autism HOPE company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Psychologisch Centrum Lambertushof company nor Autism HOPE company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Autism HOPE company nor Psychologisch Centrum Lambertushof company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Autism HOPE nor Psychologisch Centrum Lambertushof holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Autism HOPE company nor Psychologisch Centrum Lambertushof company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Psychologisch Centrum Lambertushof company employs more people globally than Autism HOPE company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Autism HOPE nor Psychologisch Centrum Lambertushof holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Autism HOPE nor Psychologisch Centrum Lambertushof holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Autism HOPE nor Psychologisch Centrum Lambertushof holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Autism HOPE nor Psychologisch Centrum Lambertushof holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Autism HOPE nor Psychologisch Centrum Lambertushof holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Autism HOPE nor Psychologisch Centrum Lambertushof holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N