Comparison Overview

Autism Education & Therapy Center

VS

Call to Mind

Autism Education & Therapy Center

2510 Music Valley Drive, Nashville, TN, 37214, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

At Autism ETC, we specialize in Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) therapy, providing personalized, evidence-based care for children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). With locations across Tennessee and Arizona, we’ve redefined autism care by focusing on tailored solutions that help children thrive in everyday environments, including preparing them to successfully re-enter the classroom. Our mission is to empower children and their families with the skills and support they need to navigate life’s challenges and reach their full potential. With a team of dedicated experts, we are proud to be a leader in autism therapy and a trusted resource in the communities we serve.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 75
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Call to Mind

undefined, Abbotsford, Victoria, 3027, AU
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Call to Mind was founded to better utilise telecommunications and modern technology to address the barriers to accessing mental health services and the associated inequality for people in rural and remote communities of Australia. Call to Mind breaks down these barriers through addressing issues of availability, accessibility and stigma. Our team works to help people better navigate the mental health system, providing patients and doctors alike with a comprehensive, seamless and flexible platform to do so. The use of secure video conferencing eliminates geographical barriers, giving patients unprecedented access to practitioners with a range of skills, while also offering psychiatrists and psychologists the ability to treat patients according to their availability, lifestyle and specialty. Call to Mind supports people to find the right mental health solution for them, giving them access to quality mental health care and bringing choice to those who need it most. If you're a psychiatrist or psychologist eligible to practice in Australia interested in working with Call to Mind - anytime, anywhere - please contact us at [email protected]. Call to Mind is now part of the broader HealthBright business. HealthBright is a leading provider of innovative mental health services, delivering high-quality affordable and accessible telehealth services Australia wide. For more information, visit https://health-bright.com.au/.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/autism-education-&-therapy-center.jpeg
Autism Education & Therapy Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/calltomind.jpeg
Call to Mind
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Autism Education & Therapy Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Call to Mind
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Autism Education & Therapy Center in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Call to Mind in 2026.

Incident History — Autism Education & Therapy Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Autism Education & Therapy Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Call to Mind (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Call to Mind cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/autism-education-&-therapy-center.jpeg
Autism Education & Therapy Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/calltomind.jpeg
Call to Mind
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Autism Education & Therapy Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Call to Mind company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Call to Mind company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Autism Education & Therapy Center company.

In the current year, Call to Mind company and Autism Education & Therapy Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Call to Mind company nor Autism Education & Therapy Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Call to Mind company nor Autism Education & Therapy Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Call to Mind company nor Autism Education & Therapy Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Autism Education & Therapy Center company nor Call to Mind company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Autism Education & Therapy Center nor Call to Mind holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Autism Education & Therapy Center company nor Call to Mind company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Autism Education & Therapy Center company employs more people globally than Call to Mind company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Autism Education & Therapy Center nor Call to Mind holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Autism Education & Therapy Center nor Call to Mind holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Autism Education & Therapy Center nor Call to Mind holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Autism Education & Therapy Center nor Call to Mind holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Autism Education & Therapy Center nor Call to Mind holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Autism Education & Therapy Center nor Call to Mind holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N