Comparison Overview

Auth0

VS

AlmavivA Group

Auth0

10900 NE 8th St, Bellevue, WA, 98004, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 700 and 749

The Auth0 Platform takes a modern approach to Identity and enables organizations to provide secure access to any application, for any user. Auth0 is a highly customizable platform that is as simple as development teams want, and as flexible as they need. Safeguarding billions of login transactions each month, Auth0 delivers convenience, privacy, and security so customers can focus on innovation. Auth0 is part of Okta, Inc.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 393
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

AlmavivA Group

Via di Casal Boccone, 188-190, Roma, IT, 00137
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Almaviva is synonymous with digital innovation. Proven experience, unique skills, ongoing research and in-depth knowledge of a range of public and private market sectors are what make it the leading Italian Group in Information & Communications Technology. Almaviva leads the Country growth and takes up the challenge that companies must face to remain competitive in the Absolute Digital Age, by innovating their business model, organization, enterprise culture and ICT. With 41,000 people - 7,000 in Italy and 34,000 overseas - Almaviva is the 3rd private Italian Group in terms of people worldwide, with a turnover of € 1.411 million in 2024. Almaviva Group operates globally, with 44 offices in Italy and 35 abroad. It has a significant presence in Brazil, and is also operational in the United States, Colombia, Egypt, Finland, the Dominican Republic, Saudi Arabia, Spain, Tunisia, and Brussels, the nerve center of the EU. Since 2015 Almaviva is a partner of the world's largest corporate sustainability initiative, UN Global Compact.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 47,385
Subsidiaries: 15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/auth0.jpeg
Auth0
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/almaviva-group.jpeg
AlmavivA Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Auth0
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
AlmavivA Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Auth0 in 2025.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AlmavivA Group in 2025.

Incident History — Auth0 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Auth0 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — AlmavivA Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AlmavivA Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/auth0.jpeg
Auth0
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2020
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/almaviva-group.jpeg
AlmavivA Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

AlmavivA Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Auth0 company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Auth0 company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas AlmavivA Group company has not reported any.

In the current year, AlmavivA Group company and Auth0 company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither AlmavivA Group company nor Auth0 company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Auth0 company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other AlmavivA Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither AlmavivA Group company nor Auth0 company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Auth0 company nor AlmavivA Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Auth0 nor AlmavivA Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

AlmavivA Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Auth0 company.

AlmavivA Group company employs more people globally than Auth0 company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither Auth0 nor AlmavivA Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Auth0 nor AlmavivA Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Auth0 nor AlmavivA Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Auth0 nor AlmavivA Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Auth0 nor AlmavivA Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Auth0 nor AlmavivA Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X