Comparison Overview

Australian Institute of Policy and Science

VS

The Bar Standards Board

Australian Institute of Policy and Science

Room 381, Blackburn Building, Camperdown, 2050, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.aips.org.au/

The Australian Institute of Policy and Science (AIPS) is an independent not-for-profit organisation first established in 1932 that aims to bring science, people and policy, community and industry actors closer together to encourage engagement and informed debate on key current issues in Australia and globally. Science and technology have an important contribution to make to contemporary social, economic, political, security, ethical and cultural issues. Whether it is about climate change, water, renewable energy, nanotechnology, health advancement or food security, over the coming decades many of the challenges facing us will require scientific input into policy making, a scientifically literate community and greater public engagement with science and technology. Today, the Australian Institute of Policy and Science is dedicated to responding to these challenges and to partnering with others in the not-for-profit, community, industry, education, research, government and other sectors to: - Increase public engagement in science and ensure people have a voice in decisions that affect them - Promote excellence in research, innovation and the promotion and communication of science - Inform and influence policy and policy-making through expert comment and input - Invest in a scientifically inpsired, literate and skilled Australia that contributes to local and global challenges

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

The Bar Standards Board

289-293 High Holborn, London, GB, WC1V 7HZ
Last Update: 2025-11-06
Between 700 and 749
http://www.barstandardsboard.org.uk/

The Bar Standards Board (BSB) regulates barristers and specialised legal services businesses in England and Wales in the public interest. If you wish to communicate with the BSB, please email us at [email protected] or refer to our website https://www.barstandardsboard.org.uk/for-the-public/reporting-concerns.html if you wish to report a concern about a barrister. Reports concerning barristers and requests for waivers and authorisations are dealt with in confidence and it is not therefore our policy to respond to messages sent via social media (Facebook Messenger, LinkedIn or Twitter/X).

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 181
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/australian-institute-of-policy-and-science.jpeg
Australian Institute of Policy and Science
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-bar-standards-board.jpeg
The Bar Standards Board
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Australian Institute of Policy and Science
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Bar Standards Board
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Australian Institute of Policy and Science in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Bar Standards Board in 2025.

Incident History — Australian Institute of Policy and Science (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Australian Institute of Policy and Science cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Bar Standards Board (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Bar Standards Board cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/australian-institute-of-policy-and-science.jpeg
Australian Institute of Policy and Science
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-bar-standards-board.jpeg
The Bar Standards Board
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Bar Standards Board company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Australian Institute of Policy and Science company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Bar Standards Board company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Australian Institute of Policy and Science company.

In the current year, The Bar Standards Board company and Australian Institute of Policy and Science company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Bar Standards Board company nor Australian Institute of Policy and Science company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Bar Standards Board company nor Australian Institute of Policy and Science company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Bar Standards Board company nor Australian Institute of Policy and Science company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Australian Institute of Policy and Science company nor The Bar Standards Board company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Australian Institute of Policy and Science nor The Bar Standards Board holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Australian Institute of Policy and Science company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to The Bar Standards Board company.

The Bar Standards Board company employs more people globally than Australian Institute of Policy and Science company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Australian Institute of Policy and Science nor The Bar Standards Board holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Australian Institute of Policy and Science nor The Bar Standards Board holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Australian Institute of Policy and Science nor The Bar Standards Board holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Australian Institute of Policy and Science nor The Bar Standards Board holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Australian Institute of Policy and Science nor The Bar Standards Board holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Australian Institute of Policy and Science nor The Bar Standards Board holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References