Comparison Overview

Australian Institute of Policy and Science

VS

LURA Consulting

Australian Institute of Policy and Science

Room 381, Blackburn Building, Camperdown, 2050, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.aips.org.au/

The Australian Institute of Policy and Science (AIPS) is an independent not-for-profit organisation first established in 1932 that aims to bring science, people and policy, community and industry actors closer together to encourage engagement and informed debate on key current issues in Australia and globally. Science and technology have an important contribution to make to contemporary social, economic, political, security, ethical and cultural issues. Whether it is about climate change, water, renewable energy, nanotechnology, health advancement or food security, over the coming decades many of the challenges facing us will require scientific input into policy making, a scientifically literate community and greater public engagement with science and technology. Today, the Australian Institute of Policy and Science is dedicated to responding to these challenges and to partnering with others in the not-for-profit, community, industry, education, research, government and other sectors to: - Increase public engagement in science and ensure people have a voice in decisions that affect them - Promote excellence in research, innovation and the promotion and communication of science - Inform and influence policy and policy-making through expert comment and input - Invest in a scientifically inpsired, literate and skilled Australia that contributes to local and global challenges

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

LURA Consulting

None
Last Update: 2025-11-10
Between 700 and 749
http://www.lura.ca

As leaders in collaborative community sustainability planning, Lura has partnered with public agencies and their communities to achieve economic, environmental and community prosperity for present and future generations. For over 30 years, we have worked with governments, their partners, stakeholders, and communities to develop collaborative policies, plans and programs. Lura’s key strength is our ability to develop strong processes, and provide the essential scientific and technical basis that enables Lura, and the communities we work with to analyse and link community, economic, and environmental values, and create the common ground. This big picture approach to planning enables municipal leaders to easily move plans and projects forward. Every year, Lura delivers hundreds of projects for municipal, provincial, national and international clients. For every project, we are committed to ensuring our team provides the upmost in terms of excellence in project design and delivery, quality, and service. We have a solid reputation amongst our clients for going above and beyond the specifications of our commitments to ensure that our clients and their communities are proud of the plans we develop together.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/australian-institute-of-policy-and-science.jpeg
Australian Institute of Policy and Science
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lura-consulting.jpeg
LURA Consulting
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Australian Institute of Policy and Science
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
LURA Consulting
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Australian Institute of Policy and Science in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LURA Consulting in 2025.

Incident History — Australian Institute of Policy and Science (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Australian Institute of Policy and Science cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — LURA Consulting (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LURA Consulting cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/australian-institute-of-policy-and-science.jpeg
Australian Institute of Policy and Science
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lura-consulting.jpeg
LURA Consulting
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

LURA Consulting company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Australian Institute of Policy and Science company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, LURA Consulting company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Australian Institute of Policy and Science company.

In the current year, LURA Consulting company and Australian Institute of Policy and Science company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither LURA Consulting company nor Australian Institute of Policy and Science company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither LURA Consulting company nor Australian Institute of Policy and Science company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither LURA Consulting company nor Australian Institute of Policy and Science company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Australian Institute of Policy and Science company nor LURA Consulting company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Australian Institute of Policy and Science nor LURA Consulting holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Australian Institute of Policy and Science company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to LURA Consulting company.

LURA Consulting company employs more people globally than Australian Institute of Policy and Science company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Australian Institute of Policy and Science nor LURA Consulting holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Australian Institute of Policy and Science nor LURA Consulting holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Australian Institute of Policy and Science nor LURA Consulting holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Australian Institute of Policy and Science nor LURA Consulting holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Australian Institute of Policy and Science nor LURA Consulting holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Australian Institute of Policy and Science nor LURA Consulting holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References