Comparison Overview

Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC)

VS

Journal of Science Policy & Governance (JSPG)

Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC)

Level 15, Sydney, NSW, 2000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 700 and 749

The Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC) provides advice to governments on energy market development and is the rule maker for Australian electricity and gas markets. We take a long-term view of what needs to be done to assure consumers of reliable, secure, electricity and gas services at the best price. The National Electricity Rules, National Gas Rules and Retail Energy Rules impact on how market participants can operate in the competitive wholesale generation and retail sectors; provide specific rights for consumers to whom energy is sold or supplied; and also govern the economic regulation of electricity transmission and distribution services – the ‘poles and wires’ – and gas pipelines. Stakeholder concerns are at the heart of our work. Our stakeholders help shape our thinking and provide valuable input to our rule making and advice to governments.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 136
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Journal of Science Policy & Governance (JSPG)

undefined, Washington, DC, District of Columbia, 20005, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

The Journal of Science Policy & Governance (JSPG) is a 501-c3 non-profit organization based in the United States and an internationally recognized, open-access, peer-reviewed publication dedicated to elevating students, post-docs, policy fellows and young scholars in science, technology and innovation policy and governance debate worldwide. Since 2011, JSPG has served as a vehicle for students and early career researchers to bolster their research and writing credentials in science policy. Subscribe to our newsletter: http://bit.ly/JSPGNewsletter

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 35
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/australian-energy-market-commission.jpeg
Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-journal-of-science-policy-and-governance.jpeg
Journal of Science Policy & Governance (JSPG)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Journal of Science Policy & Governance (JSPG)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC) in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Journal of Science Policy & Governance (JSPG) in 2025.

Incident History — Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Journal of Science Policy & Governance (JSPG) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Journal of Science Policy & Governance (JSPG) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/australian-energy-market-commission.jpeg
Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-journal-of-science-policy-and-governance.jpeg
Journal of Science Policy & Governance (JSPG)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Journal of Science Policy & Governance (JSPG) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Journal of Science Policy & Governance (JSPG) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC) company.

In the current year, Journal of Science Policy & Governance (JSPG) company and Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Journal of Science Policy & Governance (JSPG) company nor Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Journal of Science Policy & Governance (JSPG) company nor Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Journal of Science Policy & Governance (JSPG) company nor Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC) company nor Journal of Science Policy & Governance (JSPG) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC) nor Journal of Science Policy & Governance (JSPG) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC) company nor Journal of Science Policy & Governance (JSPG) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC) company employs more people globally than Journal of Science Policy & Governance (JSPG) company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC) nor Journal of Science Policy & Governance (JSPG) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC) nor Journal of Science Policy & Governance (JSPG) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC) nor Journal of Science Policy & Governance (JSPG) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC) nor Journal of Science Policy & Governance (JSPG) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC) nor Journal of Science Policy & Governance (JSPG) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC) nor Journal of Science Policy & Governance (JSPG) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H