Comparison Overview

Australian Civil-Military Centre

VS

Roosevelt Institute

Australian Civil-Military Centre

PO Box 7947, CANBERRA BC, ACT, 2610, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.acmc.gov.au

The Australian Government’s establishment of the Australian Civil-Military Centre (ACMC) recognises the growing importance of civil-military collaboration and demonstrates Australia’s commitment to sustainable peace and prosperity in the Asia-Pacific and more globally. Australia has a long and proud record of contributing to peace and stabilisation operations, and to disaster management overseas. The ACMC works with government and non-government stakeholders to build even more integrated national and international civil-military approaches to conflict and disaster management. The ACMC is administered by Defence, but reflects a whole-of-government approach with personnel seconded from a number of departments and agencies. Applying a collaborative approach with government agencies, the United Nations and other relevant partners, the Centre focuses on improving civil-military education and training, and developing civil-military doctrine and guiding principles. Through its research program on relevant civil-military issues, the ACMC identifies best practice responses to key lessons learned and recommends their application to achieve continuous improvement. We work with our partners and stakeholders to provide a valued resource in achieving effective civil-military outcomes.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 28
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Roosevelt Institute

570 Lexington Ave, 5th Floor, New York, NY, US, 10022
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749
http://www.rooseveltinstitute.org

The Roosevelt Institute, a New York-based think tank, promotes bold policy reforms that would redefine the American economy and our democracy. With a focus on curbing corporate power and reclaiming public power, Roosevelt is helping people understand that the economy is shaped by choices—via institutions and the rules that structure markets—while also exploring the economics of race and gender and the changing 21st-century economy. Roosevelt is armed with a transformative vision for the future, working to move the country toward a new economic and political system: one built by many for the good of all. We bring together thousands of thinkers and doers—from a new generation of leaders in every state to Nobel laureate economists working to redefine the rules that guide our social and economic realities. We rethink and reshape everything from local policy to federal legislation, orienting toward a new economic and political system: one built by many for the good of all.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 161
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/australian-civil-military-centre.jpeg
Australian Civil-Military Centre
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/roosevelt-institute.jpeg
Roosevelt Institute
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Australian Civil-Military Centre
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Roosevelt Institute
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Australian Civil-Military Centre in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Roosevelt Institute in 2025.

Incident History — Australian Civil-Military Centre (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Australian Civil-Military Centre cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Roosevelt Institute (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Roosevelt Institute cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/australian-civil-military-centre.jpeg
Australian Civil-Military Centre
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/roosevelt-institute.jpeg
Roosevelt Institute
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Roosevelt Institute company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Australian Civil-Military Centre company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Roosevelt Institute company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Australian Civil-Military Centre company.

In the current year, Roosevelt Institute company and Australian Civil-Military Centre company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Roosevelt Institute company nor Australian Civil-Military Centre company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Roosevelt Institute company nor Australian Civil-Military Centre company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Roosevelt Institute company nor Australian Civil-Military Centre company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Australian Civil-Military Centre company nor Roosevelt Institute company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Australian Civil-Military Centre nor Roosevelt Institute holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Australian Civil-Military Centre company nor Roosevelt Institute company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Roosevelt Institute company employs more people globally than Australian Civil-Military Centre company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Australian Civil-Military Centre nor Roosevelt Institute holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Australian Civil-Military Centre nor Roosevelt Institute holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Australian Civil-Military Centre nor Roosevelt Institute holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Australian Civil-Military Centre nor Roosevelt Institute holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Australian Civil-Military Centre nor Roosevelt Institute holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Australian Civil-Military Centre nor Roosevelt Institute holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References