Comparison Overview

Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC)

VS

CHILDREN AT RISK

Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC)

223 Liverpool St, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, 2010, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.asbec.asn.au

The Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) is the peak body of key organisations committed to a sustainable built environment in Australia. ASBEC’s membership consists of industry and professional associations, non-government organisations and government observers who are involved in the planning, design, delivery and operation of our built environment, and are concerned with the social and environmental impacts of this sector. ASBEC provides a forum for diverse groups involved in the built environment to gather, find common ground and intelligently discuss contentious issues as well as advocate their own sustainability products, policies and initiatives. ASBEC is a non-profit volunteer organisation. Members commit their time, resources and energy to developing practical opportunities for a more sustainable built environment.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

CHILDREN AT RISK

Houston, 77256, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 700 and 749
https://childrenatrisk.org/

Our Mission: CHILDREN AT RISK serves as a catalyst for change to improve the quality of life for children through strategic research, public policy analysis, education, collaboration and advocacy. How We Are Different: CHILDREN AT RISK is the only nonprofit organization that is focused solely on the well-being of the whole child, tracks those indicators through its publication Growing Up in Houston, and proactively drives change for children by educating legislators on the importance of improving each of the key indicators. What We Do: Through its research and advocacy programs, CHILDREN AT RISK is a well-known leader in understanding the health, safety and economic indicators impacting children, and educating public policy makers in their importance in improving the lives of children. Our Vision: The focus of CHILDREN AT RISK is to make children’s needs a priority and to ensure ample resources are available for children and their families to thrive. Our Values: 1. Children First: Our top priority is ensuring a better future for our children 2. Integrity: We are accountable for quality and transparency 3. Collaboration: We achieve more together than we do individually 4. Optimism: We inspire a culture of possibility 5. Meaningful Change: Our efforts are deliberate, measurable and focus on achieving substantial impact 6. Passion: We are motivated by the work that we do

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 147
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/australian-australian-sustainable-built-environment-council-asbec-.jpeg
Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC)
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/children-at-risk.jpeg
CHILDREN AT RISK
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CHILDREN AT RISK
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CHILDREN AT RISK in 2025.

Incident History — Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CHILDREN AT RISK (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CHILDREN AT RISK cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/australian-australian-sustainable-built-environment-council-asbec-.jpeg
Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/children-at-risk.jpeg
CHILDREN AT RISK
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CHILDREN AT RISK company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, CHILDREN AT RISK company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) company.

In the current year, CHILDREN AT RISK company and Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CHILDREN AT RISK company nor Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CHILDREN AT RISK company nor Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CHILDREN AT RISK company nor Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) company nor CHILDREN AT RISK company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) nor CHILDREN AT RISK holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) company nor CHILDREN AT RISK company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

CHILDREN AT RISK company employs more people globally than Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) nor CHILDREN AT RISK holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) nor CHILDREN AT RISK holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) nor CHILDREN AT RISK holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) nor CHILDREN AT RISK holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) nor CHILDREN AT RISK holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) nor CHILDREN AT RISK holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References