Comparison Overview

Austin Tenants' Council

VS

Lifetime Solicitors

Austin Tenants' Council

1619 E Cesar Chavez St, Austin, Texas, US, 78702
Last Update: 2025-11-28

The Austin Tenants’ Council protects tenants’ rights and educates the community on fair housing. Our vision is to make Texas communities open to all without discrimination and free of landlord-tenant disputes. Operating under the philosophy that everyone has a right to safe, decent, fair, and affordable housing, the Austin Tenants’ Council fulfills thousands of requests each year for help with housing problems. ATC programs focus on housing discrimination; tenant-landlord education and information; and housing repair and rehabilitation.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Lifetime Solicitors

Unit 3, Southview Business Centre , Stamford, Lincolnshire, PE9 2JL, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27

At Lifetime Solicitors we pride ourselves on providing our clients with market leading customer service, and the legal services they will need as they progress through life. Our team of qualified professionals are able to deal with clients residential conveyancing needs, help to protect their assets with our estate planning and family law services, and ensuring that on death their last wishes are fulfilled through the Probate process. Our legal team and advisors are passionate about delivering the best solutions for our clients’ needs and ensuring these services will protect our clients, giving them complete peace of mind both during and after their lifetime. Our aim at Lifetime Solicitors is to be a trusted and friendly source of legal advice and solutions.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/austin-tenants-council-inc.jpeg
Austin Tenants' Council
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lifetime-solicitors.jpeg
Lifetime Solicitors
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Austin Tenants' Council
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lifetime Solicitors
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Austin Tenants' Council in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lifetime Solicitors in 2025.

Incident History — Austin Tenants' Council (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Austin Tenants' Council cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lifetime Solicitors (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lifetime Solicitors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/austin-tenants-council-inc.jpeg
Austin Tenants' Council
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lifetime-solicitors.jpeg
Lifetime Solicitors
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Austin Tenants' Council company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Lifetime Solicitors company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Lifetime Solicitors company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Austin Tenants' Council company.

In the current year, Lifetime Solicitors company and Austin Tenants' Council company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lifetime Solicitors company nor Austin Tenants' Council company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lifetime Solicitors company nor Austin Tenants' Council company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lifetime Solicitors company nor Austin Tenants' Council company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Austin Tenants' Council company nor Lifetime Solicitors company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Austin Tenants' Council nor Lifetime Solicitors holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Austin Tenants' Council company nor Lifetime Solicitors company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lifetime Solicitors company employs more people globally than Austin Tenants' Council company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Austin Tenants' Council nor Lifetime Solicitors holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Austin Tenants' Council nor Lifetime Solicitors holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Austin Tenants' Council nor Lifetime Solicitors holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Austin Tenants' Council nor Lifetime Solicitors holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Austin Tenants' Council nor Lifetime Solicitors holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Austin Tenants' Council nor Lifetime Solicitors holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X