Comparison Overview

Aurora Flags and Banners

VS

The Print Authority

Aurora Flags and Banners

undefined, Edmonton, undefined, undefined, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Aurora Flags and Banners Inc. was formally known as "House of Flags and Banners (Div. of House of Flags Inc.)". Specialized in custom fabric and sign printing, we offer a wide range of products that will help your company stand out. From soft signage to windsocks, back drops and large billboards, we have the equipment, know how and expertise to take your marketing to the next level. Visit out website (www.auroraflags.com) and see why we've been the best for over 20 years.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Print Authority

7103b Crossroads Blvd, Brentwood, Tennessee 37027-7997, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Print Authority is a Publishing company located in Brentwood, Tennessee, United States. The Print Authority builds successful relationships, both internally among our team and externally with clients. One remarkable aspect of The Print Authority is our focus on hiring and retaining the best team members. The average tenure for all employees is 12 years at the company. (We have one team member with over 25 years tenure!) In addition, our team averages 18 years of printing industry experience per person. Our team provides continuity and outstanding service…we really get to know you and your work.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aurora-flags-and-banners.jpeg
Aurora Flags and Banners
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/print-authority.jpeg
The Print Authority
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Aurora Flags and Banners
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Print Authority
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aurora Flags and Banners in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Print Authority in 2025.

Incident History — Aurora Flags and Banners (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aurora Flags and Banners cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Print Authority (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Print Authority cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aurora-flags-and-banners.jpeg
Aurora Flags and Banners
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/print-authority.jpeg
The Print Authority
Incidents

FAQ

Both Aurora Flags and Banners company and The Print Authority company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, The Print Authority company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Aurora Flags and Banners company.

In the current year, The Print Authority company and Aurora Flags and Banners company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Print Authority company nor Aurora Flags and Banners company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Print Authority company nor Aurora Flags and Banners company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Print Authority company nor Aurora Flags and Banners company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Aurora Flags and Banners company nor The Print Authority company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Aurora Flags and Banners nor The Print Authority holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Aurora Flags and Banners company nor The Print Authority company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Print Authority company employs more people globally than Aurora Flags and Banners company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Aurora Flags and Banners nor The Print Authority holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Aurora Flags and Banners nor The Print Authority holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Aurora Flags and Banners nor The Print Authority holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Aurora Flags and Banners nor The Print Authority holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Aurora Flags and Banners nor The Print Authority holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Aurora Flags and Banners nor The Print Authority holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N