Comparison Overview

Aultman Health Foundation

VS

Aveanna Healthcare

Aultman Health Foundation

2600 Sixth Street SW, Canton, Ohio, US, 44710
Last Update: 2025-12-29
Between 700 and 749

Serving Stark and surrounding counties since 1892, Aultman Health System is committed to our patients, employees, the community and medical education. Aultman offers high-quality health care services, and we continuously reinvest to improve our facilities and technology. We provide educational and career opportunities through area schools and improve the health of our community through The Aultman Foundation. We offer health and wellness education for our community. We have hundreds of dedicated volunteers who help us positively impact the community. With 1,032 beds, over 700 active physicians and a team of more than 7,000 employees, Aultman is Stark County's largest provider of health care services.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 3,212
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Aveanna Healthcare

400 Interstate North Pkwy SE, None, Atlanta, Georgia, US, 30339
Last Update: 2025-12-27
Between 750 and 799

About Aveanna It all started with a simple idea: How can we help people live better lives by providing better homecare? That idea became a company called Aveanna, dedicated to bringing new possibilities and new hope to those we serve. At Aveanna, we believe that the ultimate place for caring is right in the comfort of home. We are a new company that has quickly established itself as a pre-eminent, national leader in healthcare as well as homecare. We believe in clinical excellence, innovation, and compassionate care to every patient and family we are privileged to help. But what sets us apart most is our focus on the relationship between the caregiver and the patient. By surrounding our patients with superior resources, and by giving our caregivers better technology and training, we are able to provide superior care that makes a difference in what’s possible in outcomes and daily living. Aveanna’s leadership team has worked for more than 40 years building other great homecare companies on a national level. Now that experience is building the homecare company of the future. Today, Aveanna Healthcare cares for patients and families in 33 states through our rapidly growing network of more than 300 branch offices, offering a variety of care and services to more than 80,000 children and adults.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 12,268
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aultman-health.jpeg
Aultman Health Foundation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aveanna-healthcare.jpeg
Aveanna Healthcare
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Aultman Health Foundation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Aveanna Healthcare
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

Aultman Health Foundation has 17.65% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aveanna Healthcare in 2025.

Incident History — Aultman Health Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aultman Health Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Aveanna Healthcare (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aveanna Healthcare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aultman-health.jpeg
Aultman Health Foundation
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized third-party access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aveanna-healthcare.jpeg
Aveanna Healthcare
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2019
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Email Account Compromise
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Aveanna Healthcare company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Aultman Health Foundation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Aultman Health Foundation and Aveanna Healthcare have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Aultman Health Foundation company has reported more cyber incidents than Aveanna Healthcare company.

Neither Aveanna Healthcare company nor Aultman Health Foundation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both Aveanna Healthcare company and Aultman Health Foundation company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither Aveanna Healthcare company nor Aultman Health Foundation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Aultman Health Foundation company nor Aveanna Healthcare company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Aultman Health Foundation nor Aveanna Healthcare holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Aveanna Healthcare company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Aultman Health Foundation company.

Aveanna Healthcare company employs more people globally than Aultman Health Foundation company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Aultman Health Foundation nor Aveanna Healthcare holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Aultman Health Foundation nor Aveanna Healthcare holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Aultman Health Foundation nor Aveanna Healthcare holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Aultman Health Foundation nor Aveanna Healthcare holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Aultman Health Foundation nor Aveanna Healthcare holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Aultman Health Foundation nor Aveanna Healthcare holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Input Validation vulnerability in qs (parse modules) allows HTTP DoS.This issue affects qs: < 6.14.1. SummaryThe arrayLimit option in qs does not enforce limits for bracket notation (a[]=1&a[]=2), allowing attackers to cause denial-of-service via memory exhaustion. Applications using arrayLimit for DoS protection are vulnerable. DetailsThe arrayLimit option only checks limits for indexed notation (a[0]=1&a[1]=2) but completely bypasses it for bracket notation (a[]=1&a[]=2). Vulnerable code (lib/parse.js:159-162): if (root === '[]' && options.parseArrays) { obj = utils.combine([], leaf); // No arrayLimit check } Working code (lib/parse.js:175): else if (index <= options.arrayLimit) { // Limit checked here obj = []; obj[index] = leaf; } The bracket notation handler at line 159 uses utils.combine([], leaf) without validating against options.arrayLimit, while indexed notation at line 175 checks index <= options.arrayLimit before creating arrays. PoCTest 1 - Basic bypass: npm install qs const qs = require('qs'); const result = qs.parse('a[]=1&a[]=2&a[]=3&a[]=4&a[]=5&a[]=6', { arrayLimit: 5 }); console.log(result.a.length); // Output: 6 (should be max 5) Test 2 - DoS demonstration: const qs = require('qs'); const attack = 'a[]=' + Array(10000).fill('x').join('&a[]='); const result = qs.parse(attack, { arrayLimit: 100 }); console.log(result.a.length); // Output: 10000 (should be max 100) Configuration: * arrayLimit: 5 (test 1) or arrayLimit: 100 (test 2) * Use bracket notation: a[]=value (not indexed a[0]=value) ImpactDenial of Service via memory exhaustion. Affects applications using qs.parse() with user-controlled input and arrayLimit for protection. Attack scenario: * Attacker sends HTTP request: GET /api/search?filters[]=x&filters[]=x&...&filters[]=x (100,000+ times) * Application parses with qs.parse(query, { arrayLimit: 100 }) * qs ignores limit, parses all 100,000 elements into array * Server memory exhausted → application crashes or becomes unresponsive * Service unavailable for all users Real-world impact: * Single malicious request can crash server * No authentication required * Easy to automate and scale * Affects any endpoint parsing query strings with bracket notation

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in code-projects Refugee Food Management System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /home/editfood.php. This manipulation of the argument a/b/c/d causes sql injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in code-projects Refugee Food Management System 1.0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /home/editrefugee.php. The manipulation of the argument rfid results in sql injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel vulnerability in Mobile Builder Mobile builder allows Authentication Abuse.This issue affects Mobile builder: from n/a through 1.4.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Hiroaki Miyashita Custom Field Template allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Custom Field Template: from n/a through 2.7.5.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L