Comparison Overview

Augustine Casino

VS

Virginia Lottery

Augustine Casino

84001 Avenue 54, Coachella, California, 92236, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Augustine Casino was the first modern day business enterprise of the Augustine Band of Cahuilla Indians when it opened July 18, 2002. A true locals’ treasure known for friendly and prompt service, Augustine features 750 of the loosest and most popular slot machines. The award-winning Café 54 and Menyikish Grill offer a casual dining experience with great food and amazing value. We are the second largest employer in the City of Coachella. Over 20% of our Team Members have been employed with Augustine Casino for 10 years or more.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 98
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Virginia Lottery

600 East Main Street, Richmond, VA, 23219, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

At the Virginia Lottery, we take playing seriously. Fun matters. Excitement matters. And so does the education of Virginia's youngest residents. It's the reason we play so enthusiastically. Every time you scratch a ticket or pick your numbers for the big jackpot, you are creating winners in education all over Virginia. In Fiscal Year 2024, the Lottery contributed more than $934 million to Virginia's public schools.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 371
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/augustine-casino.jpeg
Augustine Casino
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/virginia-lottery.jpeg
Virginia Lottery
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Augustine Casino
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Virginia Lottery
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Augustine Casino in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Virginia Lottery in 2025.

Incident History — Augustine Casino (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Augustine Casino cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Virginia Lottery (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Virginia Lottery cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/augustine-casino.jpeg
Augustine Casino
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/virginia-lottery.jpeg
Virginia Lottery
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Virginia Lottery company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Augustine Casino company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Virginia Lottery company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Augustine Casino company.

In the current year, Virginia Lottery company and Augustine Casino company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Virginia Lottery company nor Augustine Casino company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Virginia Lottery company nor Augustine Casino company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Virginia Lottery company nor Augustine Casino company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Augustine Casino company nor Virginia Lottery company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Augustine Casino nor Virginia Lottery holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Augustine Casino company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Virginia Lottery company.

Virginia Lottery company employs more people globally than Augustine Casino company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Augustine Casino nor Virginia Lottery holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Augustine Casino nor Virginia Lottery holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Augustine Casino nor Virginia Lottery holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Augustine Casino nor Virginia Lottery holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Augustine Casino nor Virginia Lottery holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Augustine Casino nor Virginia Lottery holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H