Comparison Overview

Augustine Casino

VS

Harrington Raceway and Casino

Augustine Casino

84001 Avenue 54, Coachella, California, 92236, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Augustine Casino was the first modern day business enterprise of the Augustine Band of Cahuilla Indians when it opened July 18, 2002. A true locals’ treasure known for friendly and prompt service, Augustine features 750 of the loosest and most popular slot machines. The award-winning Café 54 and Menyikish Grill offer a casual dining experience with great food and amazing value. We are the second largest employer in the City of Coachella. Over 20% of our Team Members have been employed with Augustine Casino for 10 years or more.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 98
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Harrington Raceway and Casino

15 W RIDER RD, None, HARRINGTON, DE, US, 19952
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 700 and 749

Harrington Raceway & Casino is a 'racino'​ comfortably located in the center of Delaware on the southern city limits of Harrington, Delaware, 25 minutes south of Dover. Our location is an easy half-hour commute from Delaware's beach resort areas. We have over 1,700 slot machines, a full range of table games, simulcast horse race wagering from around the world, live harness racing on our half-mile track, and sports betting. In addition, we promote and host concerts and entertainment revues. Our customers can enjoy a drink and listen to the best local bands at Bonz Lounge or on the Patio during the summer months, or in the Gold Room during cooler times. We offer a wide variety of culinary options including our award winning Buffet, a Cafe for casual dining, Murphy's Sports bar, Bolo's carved meat sandwich counter and fine dining at Bonz Restaurant. Whether you are conducting a business function, hosting a party or celebrating a special occasion, our catering can accommodate gatherings of up to 1,000, or we can bring the party to you, while taking care of everything from the plates to the grapes, ensuring the highest level of flexibility, service and hospitality.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 195
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/augustine-casino.jpeg
Augustine Casino
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/harrington-raceway-inc..jpeg
Harrington Raceway and Casino
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Augustine Casino
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Harrington Raceway and Casino
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Augustine Casino in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Harrington Raceway and Casino in 2025.

Incident History — Augustine Casino (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Augustine Casino cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Harrington Raceway and Casino (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Harrington Raceway and Casino cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/augustine-casino.jpeg
Augustine Casino
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/harrington-raceway-inc..jpeg
Harrington Raceway and Casino
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: External System Breach (Hacking)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Augustine Casino company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Harrington Raceway and Casino company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Harrington Raceway and Casino company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Augustine Casino company has not reported any.

In the current year, Harrington Raceway and Casino company and Augustine Casino company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Harrington Raceway and Casino company nor Augustine Casino company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Harrington Raceway and Casino company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Augustine Casino company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Harrington Raceway and Casino company nor Augustine Casino company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Augustine Casino company nor Harrington Raceway and Casino company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Augustine Casino nor Harrington Raceway and Casino holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Augustine Casino company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Harrington Raceway and Casino company.

Harrington Raceway and Casino company employs more people globally than Augustine Casino company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Augustine Casino nor Harrington Raceway and Casino holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Augustine Casino nor Harrington Raceway and Casino holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Augustine Casino nor Harrington Raceway and Casino holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Augustine Casino nor Harrington Raceway and Casino holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Augustine Casino nor Harrington Raceway and Casino holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Augustine Casino nor Harrington Raceway and Casino holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H