Comparison Overview

Augusta Canal National Heritage Area

VS

Singapore Chinese Cultural Centre

Augusta Canal National Heritage Area

undefined, undefined, undefined, 30901, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Built in 1845 as a source of power, water and transportation, the Augusta Canal is the only intact industrial canal in the American South in continuous use. During the Civil War it was the site of the Confederate State of America Powderworks complex. Deepened and widened in the 1870s, the canal brought an industrial boom to the city, especially in textile manufacturing. In 1975 the Canal and its mills were listed on the National Register of Historic Places and declared National Historic Landmark in 1978. In 1996 the United States Congress designated the Augusta Canal and nearby land a National Heritage Area. Several canal-side structures pre-date the War Between the States and others to the later 19th Century and the heyday of America’s Industrial revolution. A "National Heritage Area" is a place designated by the United States Congress where natural, cultural, historic and recreational resources combine to form a cohesive, nationally-distinctive landscape arising from patterns of human activity shaped by geography. These areas tell nationally important stories about our nation and are representative of the national experience through both the physical features that remain and the traditions that have evolved within them.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Singapore Chinese Cultural Centre

1 Straits Boulevard, Singapore, 018906, SG
Last Update: 2026-01-22

The Singapore Chinese Cultural Centre (SCCC) collaborates with arts and cultural groups and community partners to promote and develop local Chinese culture. By creating accessible and engaging content, we strive to nurture greater appreciation of our multi-cultural identity and sense of belonging. Opened by our Patron PM Lee Hsien Loong on 19 May 2017, our Centre located in the heart of Singapore encourages everyone to enjoy exhibitions, fairs, performances, seminars, talks, workshops and other cultural activities throughout the year.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 58
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/augusta-canal-national-heritage-area.jpeg
Augusta Canal National Heritage Area
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/singapore-chinese-cultural-centre.jpeg
Singapore Chinese Cultural Centre
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Augusta Canal National Heritage Area
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Singapore Chinese Cultural Centre
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Augusta Canal National Heritage Area in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Singapore Chinese Cultural Centre in 2026.

Incident History — Augusta Canal National Heritage Area (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Augusta Canal National Heritage Area cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Singapore Chinese Cultural Centre (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Singapore Chinese Cultural Centre cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/augusta-canal-national-heritage-area.jpeg
Augusta Canal National Heritage Area
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/singapore-chinese-cultural-centre.jpeg
Singapore Chinese Cultural Centre
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Augusta Canal National Heritage Area company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Singapore Chinese Cultural Centre company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Singapore Chinese Cultural Centre company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Augusta Canal National Heritage Area company.

In the current year, Singapore Chinese Cultural Centre company and Augusta Canal National Heritage Area company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Singapore Chinese Cultural Centre company nor Augusta Canal National Heritage Area company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Singapore Chinese Cultural Centre company nor Augusta Canal National Heritage Area company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Singapore Chinese Cultural Centre company nor Augusta Canal National Heritage Area company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Augusta Canal National Heritage Area company nor Singapore Chinese Cultural Centre company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Augusta Canal National Heritage Area nor Singapore Chinese Cultural Centre holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Augusta Canal National Heritage Area company nor Singapore Chinese Cultural Centre company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Singapore Chinese Cultural Centre company employs more people globally than Augusta Canal National Heritage Area company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Augusta Canal National Heritage Area nor Singapore Chinese Cultural Centre holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Augusta Canal National Heritage Area nor Singapore Chinese Cultural Centre holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Augusta Canal National Heritage Area nor Singapore Chinese Cultural Centre holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Augusta Canal National Heritage Area nor Singapore Chinese Cultural Centre holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Augusta Canal National Heritage Area nor Singapore Chinese Cultural Centre holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Augusta Canal National Heritage Area nor Singapore Chinese Cultural Centre holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H