Comparison Overview

Augusta Canal National Heritage Area

VS

Museum of Sex

Augusta Canal National Heritage Area

undefined, undefined, undefined, 30901, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Built in 1845 as a source of power, water and transportation, the Augusta Canal is the only intact industrial canal in the American South in continuous use. During the Civil War it was the site of the Confederate State of America Powderworks complex. Deepened and widened in the 1870s, the canal brought an industrial boom to the city, especially in textile manufacturing. In 1975 the Canal and its mills were listed on the National Register of Historic Places and declared National Historic Landmark in 1978. In 1996 the United States Congress designated the Augusta Canal and nearby land a National Heritage Area. Several canal-side structures pre-date the War Between the States and others to the later 19th Century and the heyday of America’s Industrial revolution. A "National Heritage Area" is a place designated by the United States Congress where natural, cultural, historic and recreational resources combine to form a cohesive, nationally-distinctive landscape arising from patterns of human activity shaped by geography. These areas tell nationally important stories about our nation and are representative of the national experience through both the physical features that remain and the traditions that have evolved within them.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Museum of Sex

233 Fifth Ave, NYC, New York, 10016, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

The Mission of the Museum of Sex is to preserve and present the history, evolution and cultural significance of human sexuality. The Museum produces exhibitions, publications and programs that bring the best of current scholarship to the widest possible audiences and is committed to encouraging public enlightenment, discourse and engagement.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 73
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/augusta-canal-national-heritage-area.jpeg
Augusta Canal National Heritage Area
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museum-of-sex.jpeg
Museum of Sex
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Augusta Canal National Heritage Area
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Museum of Sex
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Augusta Canal National Heritage Area in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Museum of Sex in 2026.

Incident History — Augusta Canal National Heritage Area (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Augusta Canal National Heritage Area cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Museum of Sex (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Museum of Sex cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/augusta-canal-national-heritage-area.jpeg
Augusta Canal National Heritage Area
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museum-of-sex.jpeg
Museum of Sex
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Augusta Canal National Heritage Area company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Museum of Sex company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Museum of Sex company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Augusta Canal National Heritage Area company.

In the current year, Museum of Sex company and Augusta Canal National Heritage Area company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Museum of Sex company nor Augusta Canal National Heritage Area company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Museum of Sex company nor Augusta Canal National Heritage Area company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Museum of Sex company nor Augusta Canal National Heritage Area company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Augusta Canal National Heritage Area company nor Museum of Sex company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Augusta Canal National Heritage Area nor Museum of Sex holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Augusta Canal National Heritage Area company nor Museum of Sex company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Museum of Sex company employs more people globally than Augusta Canal National Heritage Area company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Augusta Canal National Heritage Area nor Museum of Sex holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Augusta Canal National Heritage Area nor Museum of Sex holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Augusta Canal National Heritage Area nor Museum of Sex holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Augusta Canal National Heritage Area nor Museum of Sex holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Augusta Canal National Heritage Area nor Museum of Sex holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Augusta Canal National Heritage Area nor Museum of Sex holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H