Comparison Overview

Auckland Airport

VS

LATAM Airlines

Auckland Airport

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, NZ
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Over 50 years of welcoming the world to New Zealand. Auckland Airport is where we welcome visitors and farewell friends. It is where New Zealand touches the world. Over 70 per cent of visitors enter or leave New Zealand via Auckland Airport, which handles over 18.5 million passengers a year through 30 international airlines. Auckland Airport is a major driver of the New Zealand economy, generating billions of dollars, creating thousands of jobs, and making a vital contribution to New Zealand travel, trade and tourism by strengthening connections with the world. As New Zealand's major transport hub, Auckland Airport is investing in a traveller experience that all New Zealanders can be proud of. Auckland Airport is continually developing the capacity and services to ensure it will sustainably cope with an anticipated 40 million passengers a year by 2044, reflecting New Zealand’s growing popularity as one of the world’s leading tourism destinations.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 743
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

LATAM Airlines

Avenida Presidente Riesco 5711, Edificio Huidobro, Las Condes, Región Metropolitana de Santiago, CL, 7561114
Last Update: 2025-11-20

We are the leading airline in South America with the largest destinations, frequencies and aircraft fleet offer. We have the largest network of domestic destinations in five South American markets: Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador and Peru, and international operations in Latin America, Europe, the United States, Oceania and the Caribbean. Discover your next destination at latam.com Follow us on: Facebook: www.facebook.com/LATAMAirlines Twitter: www.twitter.com/LATAMAirlines YouTube: www.youtube.com/LATAMAirlines_EN Instagram: www.instagram.com/LATAMAirlines

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 41,715
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/auckland-international-airport-limited.jpeg
Auckland Airport
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/latam_airlines.jpeg
LATAM Airlines
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Auckland Airport
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
LATAM Airlines
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Auckland Airport in 2025.

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LATAM Airlines in 2025.

Incident History — Auckland Airport (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Auckland Airport cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — LATAM Airlines (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LATAM Airlines cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/auckland-international-airport-limited.jpeg
Auckland Airport
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/latam_airlines.jpeg
LATAM Airlines
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

LATAM Airlines company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Auckland Airport company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, LATAM Airlines company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Auckland Airport company.

In the current year, LATAM Airlines company and Auckland Airport company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither LATAM Airlines company nor Auckland Airport company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither LATAM Airlines company nor Auckland Airport company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither LATAM Airlines company nor Auckland Airport company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Auckland Airport company nor LATAM Airlines company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Auckland Airport nor LATAM Airlines holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

LATAM Airlines company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Auckland Airport company.

LATAM Airlines company employs more people globally than Auckland Airport company, reflecting its scale as a Airlines and Aviation.

Neither Auckland Airport nor LATAM Airlines holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Auckland Airport nor LATAM Airlines holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Auckland Airport nor LATAM Airlines holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Auckland Airport nor LATAM Airlines holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Auckland Airport nor LATAM Airlines holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Auckland Airport nor LATAM Airlines holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H