Comparison Overview

AU SMALL FINANCE BANK

VS

Sberbank

AU SMALL FINANCE BANK

19-A, DULESHWAR GARDEN, AJMER ROAD, JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN, IN, 302001
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

The dream started two decades ago by Mr. Sanjay Agarwal, a merit holder Chartered Accountant and a first generation entrepreneur, along with his proficient team. Together, the dexterous team embarked on a journey of excellence while enriching lives along the way. What started off as a dream to be one of the fastest growing NBFCs, AU Financiers is now AU SMALL FINANCE BANK. Throughout our journey we have focused on solutions, completely based on our customers’ needs. As we grow, we continue to be farsighted, aligning the interest of our community at large.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 33,336
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Sberbank

RU
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 800 and 849

Сбер — крупнейший банк в России, поставщик надёжных технологических решений и один из ведущих финансовых институтов страны. Мы не боимся меняться и открывать новые горизонты, но в то же время остаёмся верными принципам, сформированным за нашу 180-летнюю историю. Такой подход позволяет нам создавать и развивать десятки технологичных направлений. Нашими сервисами пользуются миллионы людей, а над их созданием и совершенствованием работают десятки тысяч сотрудников. Sber is the largest bank in Russia, supplier of reliable technological solutions and one of the leading national financial institutions. We are not afraid to change and open up new horizons, but at the same time we remain true to the principles that have been formed over our 180-year history. This approach allows us to create and develop dozens of technological areas. Our services are used by millions of people, and thousands of employees are working on their creation and improvement.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 10,459
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aubank.jpeg
AU SMALL FINANCE BANK
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sberbank.jpeg
Sberbank
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
AU SMALL FINANCE BANK
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sberbank
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AU SMALL FINANCE BANK in 2025.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sberbank in 2025.

Incident History — AU SMALL FINANCE BANK (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AU SMALL FINANCE BANK cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sberbank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sberbank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aubank.jpeg
AU SMALL FINANCE BANK
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sberbank.jpeg
Sberbank
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sberbank company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to AU SMALL FINANCE BANK company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Sberbank company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to AU SMALL FINANCE BANK company.

In the current year, Sberbank company and AU SMALL FINANCE BANK company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sberbank company nor AU SMALL FINANCE BANK company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Sberbank company nor AU SMALL FINANCE BANK company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Sberbank company nor AU SMALL FINANCE BANK company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither AU SMALL FINANCE BANK company nor Sberbank company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither AU SMALL FINANCE BANK nor Sberbank holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Sberbank company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to AU SMALL FINANCE BANK company.

AU SMALL FINANCE BANK company employs more people globally than Sberbank company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither AU SMALL FINANCE BANK nor Sberbank holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither AU SMALL FINANCE BANK nor Sberbank holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither AU SMALL FINANCE BANK nor Sberbank holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither AU SMALL FINANCE BANK nor Sberbank holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither AU SMALL FINANCE BANK nor Sberbank holds HIPAA certification.

Neither AU SMALL FINANCE BANK nor Sberbank holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Marshmallow is a lightweight library for converting complex objects to and from simple Python datatypes. In versions from 3.0.0rc1 to before 3.26.2 and from 4.0.0 to before 4.1.2, Schema.load(data, many=True) is vulnerable to denial of service attacks. A moderately sized request can consume a disproportionate amount of CPU time. This issue has been patched in version 3.26.2 and 4.1.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

KEDA is a Kubernetes-based Event Driven Autoscaling component. Prior to versions 2.17.3 and 2.18.3, an Arbitrary File Read vulnerability has been identified in KEDA, potentially affecting any KEDA resource that uses TriggerAuthentication to configure HashiCorp Vault authentication. The vulnerability stems from an incorrect or insufficient path validation when loading the Service Account Token specified in spec.hashiCorpVault.credential.serviceAccount. An attacker with permissions to create or modify a TriggerAuthentication resource can exfiltrate the content of any file from the node's filesystem (where the KEDA pod resides) by directing the file's content to a server under their control, as part of the Vault authentication request. The potential impact includes the exfiltration of sensitive system information, such as secrets, keys, or the content of files like /etc/passwd. This issue has been patched in versions 2.17.3 and 2.18.3.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Fedify is a TypeScript library for building federated server apps powered by ActivityPub. Prior to versions 1.6.13, 1.7.14, 1.8.15, and 1.9.2, a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability exists in Fedify's document loader. The HTML parsing regex at packages/fedify/src/runtime/docloader.ts:259 contains nested quantifiers that cause catastrophic backtracking when processing maliciously crafted HTML responses. This issue has been patched in versions 1.6.13, 1.7.14, 1.8.15, and 1.9.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Authenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE) in PluXml CMS 5.8.22 allows an attacker with administrator panel access to inject a malicious PHP webshell into a theme file (e.g., home.php).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

An issue was discovered in Xiongmai XM530 IP cameras on firmware V5.00.R02.000807D8.10010.346624.S.ONVIF 21.06. The GetStreamUri exposes RTSP URIs containing hardcoded credentials enabling direct unauthorized video stream access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N