Comparison Overview

AU SMALL FINANCE BANK

VS

Banco Bci

AU SMALL FINANCE BANK

19-A, DULESHWAR GARDEN, AJMER ROAD, JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN, IN, 302001
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

The dream started two decades ago by Mr. Sanjay Agarwal, a merit holder Chartered Accountant and a first generation entrepreneur, along with his proficient team. Together, the dexterous team embarked on a journey of excellence while enriching lives along the way. What started off as a dream to be one of the fastest growing NBFCs, AU Financiers is now AU SMALL FINANCE BANK. Throughout our journey we have focused on solutions, completely based on our customers’ needs. As we grow, we continue to be farsighted, aligning the interest of our community at large.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 33,336
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Banco Bci

125, Las Condes, Santiago -, Región Metropolitana, CL
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Porque el mundo que nos rodea se actualiza constantemente, porque tu decides hacer tu vida más simple: para entretenerte, para compartir con tu familia o para moverte por la ciudad. En Bci evolucionamos junto a ti, en este mundo donde todo se transforma una y otra vez, con soluciones que harán tu vida más simple. Te invitamos a vivir positivamente este gran cambio para que sigamos evolucionando juntos. Únete a nuestro equipo en www.trabajaenbci.cl y #SeamosDiferentes

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 12,311
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aubank.jpeg
AU SMALL FINANCE BANK
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bci.jpeg
Banco Bci
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
AU SMALL FINANCE BANK
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Banco Bci
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AU SMALL FINANCE BANK in 2025.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Banco Bci in 2025.

Incident History — AU SMALL FINANCE BANK (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AU SMALL FINANCE BANK cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Banco Bci (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Banco Bci cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aubank.jpeg
AU SMALL FINANCE BANK
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bci.jpeg
Banco Bci
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Banco Bci company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to AU SMALL FINANCE BANK company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Banco Bci company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to AU SMALL FINANCE BANK company.

In the current year, Banco Bci company and AU SMALL FINANCE BANK company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Banco Bci company nor AU SMALL FINANCE BANK company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Banco Bci company nor AU SMALL FINANCE BANK company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Banco Bci company nor AU SMALL FINANCE BANK company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither AU SMALL FINANCE BANK company nor Banco Bci company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither AU SMALL FINANCE BANK nor Banco Bci holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither AU SMALL FINANCE BANK company nor Banco Bci company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

AU SMALL FINANCE BANK company employs more people globally than Banco Bci company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither AU SMALL FINANCE BANK nor Banco Bci holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither AU SMALL FINANCE BANK nor Banco Bci holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither AU SMALL FINANCE BANK nor Banco Bci holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither AU SMALL FINANCE BANK nor Banco Bci holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither AU SMALL FINANCE BANK nor Banco Bci holds HIPAA certification.

Neither AU SMALL FINANCE BANK nor Banco Bci holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N