Comparison Overview

AU SMALL FINANCE BANK

VS

Santander

AU SMALL FINANCE BANK

19-A, DULESHWAR GARDEN, AJMER ROAD, JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN, IN, 302001
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.au.bank.in/

The dream started two decades ago by Mr. Sanjay Agarwal, a merit holder Chartered Accountant and a first generation entrepreneur, along with his proficient team. Together, the dexterous team embarked on a journey of excellence while enriching lives along the way. What started off as a dream to be one of the fastest growing NBFCs, AU Financiers is now AU SMALL FINANCE BANK. Throughout our journey we have focused on solutions, completely based on our customers’ needs. As we grow, we continue to be farsighted, aligning the interest of our community at large.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 33,336
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Santander

Avenida de Cantabria S/N, Boadilla del Monte, Madrid, 28660, ES
Last Update: 2025-12-19
Between 800 and 849
https://www.santander.com

Banco Santander (SAN SM, STD US, BNC LN) is a leading commercial bank, founded in 1857 and headquartered in Spain and one of the largest banks in the world by market capitalization. The group’s activities are consolidated into five global businesses: Retail & Commercial Banking, Digital Consumer Bank, Corporate & Investment Banking (CIB), Wealth Management & Insurance and Payments (PagoNxt and Cards). This operating model allows the bank to better leverage its unique combination of global scale and local leadership. Santander aims to be the best open financial services platform providing services to individuals, SMEs, corporates, financial institutions and governments. The bank’s purpose is to help people and businesses prosper in a simple, personal and fair way. Santander is building a more responsible bank and has made a number of commitments to support this objective, including raising €220 billion in green financing between 2019 and 2030. In the first quarter of 2024, Banco Santander had €1.3 trillion in total funds, 166 million customers, 8,400 branches and 211,000 employees.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 136,989
Subsidiaries: 26
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aubank.jpeg
AU SMALL FINANCE BANK
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/banco-santander.jpeg
Santander
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
AU SMALL FINANCE BANK
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Santander
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AU SMALL FINANCE BANK in 2025.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Santander in 2025.

Incident History — AU SMALL FINANCE BANK (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AU SMALL FINANCE BANK cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Santander (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Santander cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aubank.jpeg
AU SMALL FINANCE BANK
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/banco-santander.jpeg
Santander
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Santander company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to AU SMALL FINANCE BANK company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Santander company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to AU SMALL FINANCE BANK company.

In the current year, Santander company and AU SMALL FINANCE BANK company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Santander company nor AU SMALL FINANCE BANK company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Santander company nor AU SMALL FINANCE BANK company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Santander company nor AU SMALL FINANCE BANK company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither AU SMALL FINANCE BANK company nor Santander company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither AU SMALL FINANCE BANK nor Santander holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Santander company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to AU SMALL FINANCE BANK company.

Santander company employs more people globally than AU SMALL FINANCE BANK company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither AU SMALL FINANCE BANK nor Santander holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither AU SMALL FINANCE BANK nor Santander holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither AU SMALL FINANCE BANK nor Santander holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither AU SMALL FINANCE BANK nor Santander holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither AU SMALL FINANCE BANK nor Santander holds HIPAA certification.

Neither AU SMALL FINANCE BANK nor Santander holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Marshmallow is a lightweight library for converting complex objects to and from simple Python datatypes. In versions from 3.0.0rc1 to before 3.26.2 and from 4.0.0 to before 4.1.2, Schema.load(data, many=True) is vulnerable to denial of service attacks. A moderately sized request can consume a disproportionate amount of CPU time. This issue has been patched in version 3.26.2 and 4.1.2.

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

KEDA is a Kubernetes-based Event Driven Autoscaling component. Prior to versions 2.17.3 and 2.18.3, an Arbitrary File Read vulnerability has been identified in KEDA, potentially affecting any KEDA resource that uses TriggerAuthentication to configure HashiCorp Vault authentication. The vulnerability stems from an incorrect or insufficient path validation when loading the Service Account Token specified in spec.hashiCorpVault.credential.serviceAccount. An attacker with permissions to create or modify a TriggerAuthentication resource can exfiltrate the content of any file from the node's filesystem (where the KEDA pod resides) by directing the file's content to a server under their control, as part of the Vault authentication request. The potential impact includes the exfiltration of sensitive system information, such as secrets, keys, or the content of files like /etc/passwd. This issue has been patched in versions 2.17.3 and 2.18.3.

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Fedify is a TypeScript library for building federated server apps powered by ActivityPub. Prior to versions 1.6.13, 1.7.14, 1.8.15, and 1.9.2, a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability exists in Fedify's document loader. The HTML parsing regex at packages/fedify/src/runtime/docloader.ts:259 contains nested quantifiers that cause catastrophic backtracking when processing maliciously crafted HTML responses. This issue has been patched in versions 1.6.13, 1.7.14, 1.8.15, and 1.9.2.

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Authenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE) in PluXml CMS 5.8.22 allows an attacker with administrator panel access to inject a malicious PHP webshell into a theme file (e.g., home.php).

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

An issue was discovered in Xiongmai XM530 IP cameras on firmware V5.00.R02.000807D8.10010.346624.S.ONVIF 21.06. The GetStreamUri exposes RTSP URIs containing hardcoded credentials enabling direct unauthorized video stream access.

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References