Comparison Overview

Atwater Library and Computer Centre

VS

Bibliotheek Rotterdam

Atwater Library and Computer Centre

1200 Avenue Atwater, Westmount, Quebec H3Z 1X4, ca
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Atwater Library and Computer Centre is an independent charitable organization specializing in English-language educational services for Greater Montreal and Quebec more widely. Programs include digital literacy and financial literacy. The organization’s heritage building functions as a hub of English-language community life. The organization emphases outreach and collaboration with other community groups.

NAICS: 519
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Bibliotheek Rotterdam

Hoogstraat 110, Rotterdam, 3011, NL
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Een van de drukstbezochte plekken van Rotterdam is de bibliotheek: hét kenniscentrum en culturele podium van Rotterdam. Natuurlijk kunt u bij ons boeken, muziek en films lenen, maar ook voor (gratis) activiteiten, workshops, goede studie- of werkruimte, het huren van een zaal of bijwonen van een voorstelling bent u bij ons aan het juiste adres. In de stad, op school en online. Ook zijn wij altijd geïnteresseerd in nieuwe samenwerkingspartners. Interesse of vragen? Neem contact met ons op via (010) 2816 100.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 292
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atwater-library-and-computer-centre.jpeg
Atwater Library and Computer Centre
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bibliotheek-rotterdam.jpeg
Bibliotheek Rotterdam
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Atwater Library and Computer Centre
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bibliotheek Rotterdam
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Atwater Library and Computer Centre in 2025.

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bibliotheek Rotterdam in 2025.

Incident History — Atwater Library and Computer Centre (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Atwater Library and Computer Centre cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bibliotheek Rotterdam (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bibliotheek Rotterdam cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atwater-library-and-computer-centre.jpeg
Atwater Library and Computer Centre
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bibliotheek-rotterdam.jpeg
Bibliotheek Rotterdam
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Atwater Library and Computer Centre company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bibliotheek Rotterdam company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Bibliotheek Rotterdam company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Atwater Library and Computer Centre company.

In the current year, Bibliotheek Rotterdam company and Atwater Library and Computer Centre company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bibliotheek Rotterdam company nor Atwater Library and Computer Centre company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Bibliotheek Rotterdam company nor Atwater Library and Computer Centre company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bibliotheek Rotterdam company nor Atwater Library and Computer Centre company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Atwater Library and Computer Centre company nor Bibliotheek Rotterdam company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Atwater Library and Computer Centre nor Bibliotheek Rotterdam holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Atwater Library and Computer Centre company nor Bibliotheek Rotterdam company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Bibliotheek Rotterdam company employs more people globally than Atwater Library and Computer Centre company, reflecting its scale as a Libraries.

Neither Atwater Library and Computer Centre nor Bibliotheek Rotterdam holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Atwater Library and Computer Centre nor Bibliotheek Rotterdam holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Atwater Library and Computer Centre nor Bibliotheek Rotterdam holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Atwater Library and Computer Centre nor Bibliotheek Rotterdam holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Atwater Library and Computer Centre nor Bibliotheek Rotterdam holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Atwater Library and Computer Centre nor Bibliotheek Rotterdam holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H