Comparison Overview

Attorney

VS

The Sedona Conference

Attorney

02360, US
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 800 and 849

Najarian & Associates, LLC Najarian & Associates, LLC located in Plymouth, Massachusetts provide quality legal services in the area of loan modification, real estate conveyancing, foreclosure defense and loss mitigation Foreclosure defense includes, but is not limited to, working with your lender to secure better rate and terms on your current mortgage in an attempt to stop the foreclosure or negotiating a short sale. Najarian & Associates, LLC pride takes pride in providing affordable and personalized legal counsel to his clients. In the complex and intimidating legal system currently existing in both the state and federal court system it is essential to have quality legal counsel when trying to prevent the loss of your home through loan modification, refinancing, foreclosure defense or loss . Najarian & Associates, LLC offers a free initial consultation to explain all of your legal options and to help you make the right decision regarding your current financial and mortgage situation.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 3,523
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Sedona Conference

301 E. Bethany Home Rd, Phoenix, Arizona, 85012, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

The Sedona Conference (TSC) is a nonprofit, 501(c)(3) research and educational institute dedicated to the advanced study of law and policy in the areas of antitrust law, complex litigation, intellectual property rights, and data security and privacy law. TSC was founded in 1997 by Richard G. Braman, who practiced in the areas of antitrust law, intellectual property, and complex litigation. TSC succeeds through the generous contributions of time by its faculties and Working Group members, and is able to fund its operations primarily through the financial support of its members, conference registrants, and sponsors. Follow us on X @TSCSedona and on Facebook @SedonaConference.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 39
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Attorney
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-sedona-conference.jpeg
The Sedona Conference
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Attorney
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Sedona Conference
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Attorney in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Sedona Conference in 2025.

Incident History — Attorney (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Attorney cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Sedona Conference (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Sedona Conference cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Attorney
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-sedona-conference.jpeg
The Sedona Conference
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Attorney company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Sedona Conference company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Sedona Conference company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Attorney company.

In the current year, The Sedona Conference company and Attorney company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Sedona Conference company nor Attorney company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Sedona Conference company nor Attorney company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Sedona Conference company nor Attorney company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Attorney company nor The Sedona Conference company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Attorney nor The Sedona Conference holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Attorney company nor The Sedona Conference company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Attorney company employs more people globally than The Sedona Conference company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Attorney nor The Sedona Conference holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Attorney nor The Sedona Conference holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Attorney nor The Sedona Conference holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Attorney nor The Sedona Conference holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Attorney nor The Sedona Conference holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Attorney nor The Sedona Conference holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X