Comparison Overview

Attic Studios

VS

Smashbox Studios

Attic Studios

11-05 44th Rd, Long Island City, New York, 11101, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 700 and 749

Attic Studios is a full service rental studio complex and production facility located approximately five minutes from Midtown Manhattan in Long Island City, Queens. Housed in a former printing facility, nearly 20,000 square feet of lofted space has been repurposed into 6 premiere rental studios and an ideal location for television and film shoots. In addition studio features include 360 daylight exposure, full service coffee bar, rooftop access, extensive on-site equipment rental and support for location shoots.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Smashbox Studios

8549 Higuera Street, Culver City, California, 90232, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10

Founded in 1990 by Dean and Davis Factor, great grandsons of acclaimed Hollywood makeup artist Max Factor, Smashbox is known throughout the industry as a hub for world-class photographers and directors to shoot important content for major magazines, ad campaigns, music & entertainment projects and brand visuals. In 1996, Dean and Davis launched Smashbox Cosmetics, the leading global beauty brand.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 76
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/attic-studios.jpeg
Attic Studios
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/smashbox-studios.jpeg
Smashbox Studios
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Attic Studios
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Smashbox Studios
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Attic Studios in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Smashbox Studios in 2025.

Incident History — Attic Studios (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Attic Studios cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Smashbox Studios (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Smashbox Studios cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/attic-studios.jpeg
Attic Studios
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/smashbox-studios.jpeg
Smashbox Studios
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Smashbox Studios company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Attic Studios company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Smashbox Studios company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Attic Studios company.

In the current year, Smashbox Studios company and Attic Studios company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Smashbox Studios company nor Attic Studios company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Smashbox Studios company nor Attic Studios company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Smashbox Studios company nor Attic Studios company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Attic Studios company nor Smashbox Studios company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Attic Studios nor Smashbox Studios holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Attic Studios company nor Smashbox Studios company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Smashbox Studios company employs more people globally than Attic Studios company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither Attic Studios nor Smashbox Studios holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Attic Studios nor Smashbox Studios holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Attic Studios nor Smashbox Studios holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Attic Studios nor Smashbox Studios holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Attic Studios nor Smashbox Studios holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Attic Studios nor Smashbox Studios holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N