Comparison Overview

ATS Systems

VS

GS PlantOptics

ATS Systems

2121 NE Jack London St, Corvallis, 97330, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22

ATS Automation provides innovative, custom built and installed manufacturing solutions to many of the world's most successful companies. ATS uses its industry-leading knowledge and global capabilities to serve the automation systems' needs of customers in industries such as medical device, pharmaceutical automation, computer/electronics, solar energy, nuclear power generation, automotive and consumer goods.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 38
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

GS PlantOptics

17335 Golf Pkwy, Brookfield, Wisconsin, 53045, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

GS PlantOptics, formerly Wonderware Midwest, is the AVEVA Select channel partner serving the upper Midwest* with local sales and technical services for the full AVEVA Software portfolio. AVEVA industrial software solutions empower users to solve the most challenging operational problems. At GS PlantOptics, we help customers build and leverage their industrial data infrastructure to achieve operational excellence, agility, and sustainability. *Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, North Dakota, South Dakota, and the Upper Peninsula of Michigan

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
ATS Systems
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wonderware-midwest.jpeg
GS PlantOptics
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ATS Systems
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
GS PlantOptics
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ATS Systems in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GS PlantOptics in 2025.

Incident History — ATS Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ATS Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — GS PlantOptics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GS PlantOptics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
ATS Systems
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wonderware-midwest.jpeg
GS PlantOptics
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ATS Systems company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to GS PlantOptics company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, GS PlantOptics company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ATS Systems company.

In the current year, GS PlantOptics company and ATS Systems company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither GS PlantOptics company nor ATS Systems company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither GS PlantOptics company nor ATS Systems company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither GS PlantOptics company nor ATS Systems company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ATS Systems company nor GS PlantOptics company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ATS Systems nor GS PlantOptics holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither ATS Systems company nor GS PlantOptics company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

ATS Systems company employs more people globally than GS PlantOptics company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither ATS Systems nor GS PlantOptics holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ATS Systems nor GS PlantOptics holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ATS Systems nor GS PlantOptics holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ATS Systems nor GS PlantOptics holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ATS Systems nor GS PlantOptics holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ATS Systems nor GS PlantOptics holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H