Comparison Overview

ATPC

VS

Otkritie

ATPC

None
Last Update: 2025-03-07 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900

Strong

Your consultant in business ATPC provides Business Management, Corporate and Accounting services for companies and individuals. The company boasts a strong international legal and tax practice, specializing in a number of areas. We put the customerโ€™s needs at the core of our business. Being able to operate in an unconventional way, we have the ability to add extra value to a project or an assignment. Hence, providing highly effective and efficient solutions. We believe that each and every customer will benefit on solutions customized to their specific needs. With worldwide offices, our firmโ€™s international legal arm can provide specialized legal advice and services to clients from all over the world. Our multi-lingual team includes young and passionate individuals, who strive to provide the best tailor-made solutions for the clients.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Otkritie

2 bld 4 Letnikovskaya St. Moscow, Moscow 115114, RU
Last Update: 2025-03-15 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900

OTKRITIE Financial Corporation is one of the most dynamic and fastest growing investment banks in Russia. The company has been operating on the stock market as a broker, asset manager, financial advisor and investment bank since 1995. OTKRITIE FC has become a trusted partner for many Russian and international, both individual and institutional investors.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atpc.jpeg
ATPC
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/otkritie.jpeg
Otkritie
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
ATPC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Otkritie
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ATPC in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Otkritie in 2025.

Incident History โ€” ATPC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ATPC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Otkritie (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Otkritie cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atpc.jpeg
ATPC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/otkritie.jpeg
Otkritie
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both ATPC company and Otkritie company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Otkritie company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ATPC company.

In the current year, Otkritie company and ATPC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Otkritie company nor ATPC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Otkritie company nor ATPC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Otkritie company nor ATPC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ATPC company nor Otkritie company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ATPC company nor Otkritie company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

ATPC company employs more people globally than Otkritie company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

TS3 Manager is modern web interface for maintaining Teamspeak3 servers. A reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability has been identified in versions 2.2.1 and earlier. The vulnerability exists in the error handling mechanism of the login page, where malicious scripts embedded in server hostnames are executed in the victim's browser context without proper sanitization. This issue is fixed in version 2.2.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

TS3 Manager is modern web interface for maintaining Teamspeak3 servers. A Denial of Dervice vulnerability has been identified in versions 2.2.1 and earlier. The vulnerability permits an unauthenticated actor to crash the application through the submission of specially crafted Unicode input, requiring no prior authentication or privileges. The flaw manifests when Unicode tag characters are submitted to the Server field on the login page. The application fails to properly handle these characters during the ASCII conversion process, resulting in an unhandled exception that terminates the application within four to five seconds of submission. This issue is fixed in version 2.2.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Weblate is a web based localization tool. An open redirect exists in versions 5.13.2 and below via the redir parameter on .within.website when Weblate is configured with Anubis and REDIRECT_DOMAINS is not set. An attacker can craft a URL on the legitimate domain that redirects a victim to an attacker-controlled site. The redirect can also be used to initiate drive-by downloads (redirecting to a URL that serves a malicious file), increasing the risk to end users. This issue is fixed in version 5.13.3.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Termix is a web-based server management platform with SSH terminal, tunneling, and file editing capabilities. The official Docker image for Termix versions 1.5.0 and below, due to being configured with an Nginx reverse proxy, causes the backend to retrieve the proxy's IP instead of the client's IP when using the req.ip method. This results in isLocalhost always returning True. Consequently, the /ssh/db/host/internal endpoint can be accessed directly without login or authentication. This endpoint records the system's stored SSH host information, including addresses, usernames, and passwords, posing an extremely high security risk. Users who use the official Termix docker image, build their own image using the official dockerfile, or utilize reverse proxy functionality will be affected by this vulnerability. This issue is fixed in version 1.6.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OpenPLC_V3 has a vulnerability in the enipThread function that occurs due to the lack of a return value. This leads to a crash when the server loop ends and execution hits an illegal ud2 instruction. This issue can be triggered remotely without authentication by starting the same server multiple times or if the server exits unexpectedly. The vulnerability allows an attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) against the PLC runtime, stopping any PC started remotely without authentication. This results in the PLC process crashing and halting all automation or control logic managed by OpenPLC.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X