Comparison Overview

Atomicom Limited

VS

Ubisoft

Atomicom Limited

None
Last Update: 2025-03-20 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000
http://www.atomicom.co.uk/

Excellent

Atomicom is a multi platform game developer based in Liverpool UK. We create exceptionally high quality digital experiences that entertain and engage a wide audience of players. Our team of talented veteran developers came together in 2005 to focus on making games for the mobile market.

NAICS: 51126
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Ubisoft

2, Avenue Pasteur, None, Saint-Mandé, Île-de-France, FR, 94160
Last Update: 2025-09-15 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000
www.ubisoftgroup.com

Ubisoft is a global leader in gaming with teams across the world crafting original and memorable gaming experiences featuring brands such as Assassin’s Creed®, Brawlhalla®, For Honor®, Far Cry®, Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon®, Just Dance®, Rabbids®, Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six®, The Crew® and Tom Clancy’s The Division®. We believe diverse perspectives help both players and teams thrive. If you’re passionate about innovation and pushing entertainment boundaries, join our journey and help us create the unknown!

NAICS: 51126
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 21,920
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atomicom.jpeg
Atomicom Limited
—
ISO 27001
Not verified
—
SOC 2
Not verified
—
GDPR
No public badge
—
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ubisoft.jpeg
Ubisoft
—
ISO 27001
Not verified
—
SOC 2
Not verified
—
GDPR
No public badge
—
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Atomicom Limited
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ubisoft
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Games Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Atomicom Limited in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Games Industry Average (This Year)

Ubisoft has 33.33% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Atomicom Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Atomicom Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ubisoft (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ubisoft cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atomicom.jpeg
Atomicom Limited
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ubisoft.jpeg
Ubisoft
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial extortion via data theft and public release threats
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 03/2022
Type:Cyber Attack
Motivation: Extortion
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both Atomicom Limited company and Ubisoft company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Ubisoft company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Atomicom Limited company has not reported any.

In the current year, Ubisoft company has reported more cyber incidents than Atomicom Limited company.

Ubisoft company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Atomicom Limited company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Ubisoft company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Atomicom Limited company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Ubisoft company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Atomicom Limited company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Atomicom Limited company nor Ubisoft company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Atomicom Limited company nor Ubisoft company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Ubisoft company employs more people globally than Atomicom Limited company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Games.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Protection Against Voltage and Clock Glitches in FPGA devices, could allow an attacker with physical access to undervolt the platform resulting in a loss of confidentiality.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Malicious code was inserted into the Nx (build system) package and several related plugins. The tampered package was published to the npm software registry, via a supply-chain attack. Affected versions contain code that scans the file system, collects credentials, and posts them to GitHub as a repo under user's accounts.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In versions from 2.1.0 to before 2.3.0, the API endpoint GET /api/problems/:id returns challenge hints in plaintext within the question object, regardless of whether the user has unlocked them via point deduction. Users can view all hints for free, undermining the business logic of the platform and reducing the integrity of the challenge system. This issue has been patched in version 2.3.0.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In version 2.1.0, the /api/admin/assign-badge endpoint lacks proper access control, allowing any authenticated user to assign high-privilege badges (e.g., Staff) to themselves. This could lead to privilege escalation and impersonation of administrative roles. This issue has been patched in version 2.2.0.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
References
Description

parse is a package designed to parse JavaScript SDK. A Prototype Pollution vulnerability in the SingleInstanceStateController.initializeState function of parse version 5.3.0 and before allows attackers to inject properties on Object.prototype via supplying a crafted payload, causing denial of service (DoS) as the minimum consequence.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
References