Comparison Overview

Atomicom Limited

VS

Keywords Studios

Atomicom Limited

None
Last Update: 2025-03-20 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

Atomicom is a multi platform game developer based in Liverpool UK. We create exceptionally high quality digital experiences that entertain and engage a wide audience of players. Our team of talented veteran developers came together in 2005 to focus on making games for the mobile market.

NAICS: 51126
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Keywords Studios

Whelan House, Dublin, Ireland, 18, IE
Last Update: 2025-03-16 (UTC)

We provide creative services to the global video games industry and beyond through our end-to-end platform, supercharged by our own technology. Our goal is to help you imagine more for your IP, bringing to life digital content that entertains, connects, and educates people worldwide.โ€‹ โ€‹ Established in 1998, we are a team of over 13,000 based across more than 70 studios in 25+ countries. We provide game-ready art, marketing services, game development, functional and localization testing, text and audio localization, everything from casting to audio post production, community management, player support, content moderation, and everything else you need across your game's entire lifecycle.โ€‹ Talk to us about your external game development needs, no matter where you're at with your project. We have the experts to provide you with a bespoke solution tailored to your needs and budget.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11,314
Subsidiaries: 33
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atomicom.jpeg
Atomicom Limited
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/keywordsstudios.jpeg
Keywords Studios
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Atomicom Limited
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Keywords Studios
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Games Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Atomicom Limited in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Games Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Keywords Studios in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Atomicom Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Atomicom Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Keywords Studios (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Keywords Studios cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atomicom.jpeg
Atomicom Limited
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/keywordsstudios.jpeg
Keywords Studios
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Atomicom Limited company and Keywords Studios company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Keywords Studios company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Atomicom Limited company.

In the current year, Keywords Studios company and Atomicom Limited company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Keywords Studios company nor Atomicom Limited company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Keywords Studios company nor Atomicom Limited company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Keywords Studios company nor Atomicom Limited company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Atomicom Limited company nor Keywords Studios company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Keywords Studios company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Atomicom Limited company.

Keywords Studios company employs more people globally than Atomicom Limited company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Games.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Protection Against Voltage and Clock Glitches in FPGA devices, could allow an attacker with physical access to undervolt the platform resulting in a loss of confidentiality.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Malicious code was inserted into the Nx (build system) package and several related plugins. The tampered package was published to the npm software registry, via a supply-chain attack. Affected versions contain code that scans the file system, collects credentials, and posts them to GitHub as a repo under user's accounts.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In versions from 2.1.0 to before 2.3.0, the API endpoint GET /api/problems/:id returns challenge hints in plaintext within the question object, regardless of whether the user has unlocked them via point deduction. Users can view all hints for free, undermining the business logic of the platform and reducing the integrity of the challenge system. This issue has been patched in version 2.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In version 2.1.0, the /api/admin/assign-badge endpoint lacks proper access control, allowing any authenticated user to assign high-privilege badges (e.g., Staff) to themselves. This could lead to privilege escalation and impersonation of administrative roles. This issue has been patched in version 2.2.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

parse is a package designed to parse JavaScript SDK. A Prototype Pollution vulnerability in the SingleInstanceStateController.initializeState function of parse version 5.3.0 and before allows attackers to inject properties on Object.prototype via supplying a crafted payload, causing denial of service (DoS) as the minimum consequence.