Comparison Overview

Atlas Performing Arts Center

VS

Chicago Symphony Orchestra

Atlas Performing Arts Center

1333 H Street, NE, Washington, District of Columbia, 20002, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.atlasarts.org

The Atlas Performing Arts Center (APAC) is home for adventurous audiences, artists and ideas — presenting contemporary music, film, dance, theatre and performing arts unlike anywhere in the city. An artistic anchor in Washington, DC’s historic H Street NE corridor, the Atlas is committed to its neighborhood and the arts community. This page will post employment announcements, internship and volunteer openings, and other opportunities at APAC.

NAICS: 711
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Chicago Symphony Orchestra

220 South Michigan Avenue, Chicago, Illinois, 60604, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cso.org

Founded in 1891, the Chicago Symphony Orchestra is consistently hailed as one of the greatest orchestras in the world. In collaboration with the best conductors and guest artists on the international music scene, the CSO performs well over one hundred concerts each year at its downtown home, Symphony Center and at the Ravinia Festival on Chicago’s North Shore. Music lovers outside Chicago enjoy the sounds of the Chicago Symphony Orchestra through best-selling recordings and frequent sold-out tour performances in the United States and around the globe.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 417
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atlas-performing-arts-center.jpeg
Atlas Performing Arts Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chicago-symphony-orchestra.jpeg
Chicago Symphony Orchestra
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Atlas Performing Arts Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Chicago Symphony Orchestra
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Atlas Performing Arts Center in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chicago Symphony Orchestra in 2025.

Incident History — Atlas Performing Arts Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Atlas Performing Arts Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Chicago Symphony Orchestra (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chicago Symphony Orchestra cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atlas-performing-arts-center.jpeg
Atlas Performing Arts Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chicago-symphony-orchestra.jpeg
Chicago Symphony Orchestra
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Chicago Symphony Orchestra company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Atlas Performing Arts Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Chicago Symphony Orchestra company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Atlas Performing Arts Center company.

In the current year, Chicago Symphony Orchestra company and Atlas Performing Arts Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Chicago Symphony Orchestra company nor Atlas Performing Arts Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Chicago Symphony Orchestra company nor Atlas Performing Arts Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Chicago Symphony Orchestra company nor Atlas Performing Arts Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Atlas Performing Arts Center company nor Chicago Symphony Orchestra company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Atlas Performing Arts Center nor Chicago Symphony Orchestra holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Atlas Performing Arts Center company nor Chicago Symphony Orchestra company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Chicago Symphony Orchestra company employs more people globally than Atlas Performing Arts Center company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither Atlas Performing Arts Center nor Chicago Symphony Orchestra holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Atlas Performing Arts Center nor Chicago Symphony Orchestra holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Atlas Performing Arts Center nor Chicago Symphony Orchestra holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Atlas Performing Arts Center nor Chicago Symphony Orchestra holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Atlas Performing Arts Center nor Chicago Symphony Orchestra holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Atlas Performing Arts Center nor Chicago Symphony Orchestra holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References