Comparison Overview

Atlas Forms & Graphics

VS

Multi-Color Christchurch

Atlas Forms & Graphics

20 Eisenhower Lane, Lombard, Illinois, 60148, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Family owned & operated custom printing partner to extraordinary hotels & organizations since 1965. We are a one-stop supplier for all the printed & branded products needed in every facet of your business--from operations to marketing efforts. Our design department ensures a consistent look and assists in creating unique branding for our clients across all industries. Your printer needs to care as much about your print project as you do. We get it. Please contact us at 630-932-6300 or via www.AtlasForms.net.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Multi-Color Christchurch

48 Waterloo Road, None, Sockburn, Christchurch, NZ, 8042
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

The depth of labelling expertise within Multi-Color Christchurch is world-class. We have acquired best-of-breed equipment and fostered label talent across four production plants in two countries. This network positions us to tackle any labelling challenge. During our 58 years, we have developed a sophisticated client service model and created robust quality processes. Inviting Multi-Color Christchurch to join your supply chain is an informed decision. We’d be delighted to work with you on your future label needs. Visit our website www.hallylabels.com to learn more. We are committed to creating an engaging and rewarding work environment for all of our employees, and we invite you to meet some of our team, learn more about the departments in our business, and browse our current vacancies on our careers page http://www.hallylabels.com/about/careers/

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 169
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atlas-forms-&-graphics.jpeg
Atlas Forms & Graphics
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/multi-color-christchurch.jpeg
Multi-Color Christchurch
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Atlas Forms & Graphics
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Multi-Color Christchurch
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Atlas Forms & Graphics in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Multi-Color Christchurch in 2025.

Incident History — Atlas Forms & Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Atlas Forms & Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Multi-Color Christchurch (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Multi-Color Christchurch cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atlas-forms-&-graphics.jpeg
Atlas Forms & Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/multi-color-christchurch.jpeg
Multi-Color Christchurch
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Atlas Forms & Graphics company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Multi-Color Christchurch company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Multi-Color Christchurch company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Atlas Forms & Graphics company.

In the current year, Multi-Color Christchurch company and Atlas Forms & Graphics company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Multi-Color Christchurch company nor Atlas Forms & Graphics company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Multi-Color Christchurch company nor Atlas Forms & Graphics company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Multi-Color Christchurch company nor Atlas Forms & Graphics company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Atlas Forms & Graphics company nor Multi-Color Christchurch company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Atlas Forms & Graphics nor Multi-Color Christchurch holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Atlas Forms & Graphics company nor Multi-Color Christchurch company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Multi-Color Christchurch company employs more people globally than Atlas Forms & Graphics company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Atlas Forms & Graphics nor Multi-Color Christchurch holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Atlas Forms & Graphics nor Multi-Color Christchurch holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Atlas Forms & Graphics nor Multi-Color Christchurch holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Atlas Forms & Graphics nor Multi-Color Christchurch holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Atlas Forms & Graphics nor Multi-Color Christchurch holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Atlas Forms & Graphics nor Multi-Color Christchurch holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N