Comparison Overview

Atlas Forms & Graphics

VS

Colonial Press International

Atlas Forms & Graphics

20 Eisenhower Lane, Lombard, Illinois, 60148, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Family owned & operated custom printing partner to extraordinary hotels & organizations since 1965. We are a one-stop supplier for all the printed & branded products needed in every facet of your business--from operations to marketing efforts. Our design department ensures a consistent look and assists in creating unique branding for our clients across all industries. Your printer needs to care as much about your print project as you do. We get it. Please contact us at 630-932-6300 or via www.AtlasForms.net.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Colonial Press International

3690 NW 50th St, Miami, 33142, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17

Founded in 1952, Colonial Press is the largest MBE commercial printer in the US. We are a progressively managed company investing in the most modern equipment, technologies and processes to provide our customers the highest levels of service and quality. We enjoy long-term, strategic partnerships with our customers and recognize that they entrust us with their “brand” each time we produce a product. Our Fortune 500 customers know that Colonial Press will deliver to their expectations. Colonial Press operates a 300,000 sq ft manufacturing facility located in Miami Florida offering full service commercial printing. Sheet fed, full web and wide web offset printing, in-house finishing, distribution and comprehensive mailing services. Quality production in a short turnaround time utilizing state of the art equipment. Products include direct mail, brochures, catalogs, directories, newspaper inserts-FSI/shared mail, In-line finished press products, books, posters, annual reports and other advertising/marketing collateral materials. What sets us apart… • Comprehensive manufacturing platform • Wide range of products and services • Competitively priced • Scalable operations, flexible scheduling • Highest quality output • Experienced service and manufacturing staffs • Modern equipment platform • Consistent adherence to customer schedules • Financial stability • Operate as a Tier I or Tier II MBE supplier

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 50
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atlas-forms-&-graphics.jpeg
Atlas Forms & Graphics
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colonial-press-international.jpeg
Colonial Press International
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Atlas Forms & Graphics
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Colonial Press International
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Atlas Forms & Graphics in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Colonial Press International in 2025.

Incident History — Atlas Forms & Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Atlas Forms & Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Colonial Press International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Colonial Press International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atlas-forms-&-graphics.jpeg
Atlas Forms & Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colonial-press-international.jpeg
Colonial Press International
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Atlas Forms & Graphics company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Colonial Press International company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Colonial Press International company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Atlas Forms & Graphics company.

In the current year, Colonial Press International company and Atlas Forms & Graphics company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Colonial Press International company nor Atlas Forms & Graphics company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Colonial Press International company nor Atlas Forms & Graphics company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Colonial Press International company nor Atlas Forms & Graphics company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Atlas Forms & Graphics company nor Colonial Press International company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Atlas Forms & Graphics nor Colonial Press International holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Atlas Forms & Graphics company nor Colonial Press International company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Colonial Press International company employs more people globally than Atlas Forms & Graphics company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Atlas Forms & Graphics nor Colonial Press International holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Atlas Forms & Graphics nor Colonial Press International holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Atlas Forms & Graphics nor Colonial Press International holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Atlas Forms & Graphics nor Colonial Press International holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Atlas Forms & Graphics nor Colonial Press International holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Atlas Forms & Graphics nor Colonial Press International holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N