Comparison Overview

Atlas Copco

VS

Nippon Steel Corporation

Atlas Copco

Sickla Industriväg 19, Stockholm, 131 54, SE
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.atlascopco.com/en-uk/sys/in-your-country

Atlas Copco delivers innovative products and solutions that help businesses grow and drive progress. Our portfolio spans compressed air and gas systems and treatment, vacuum solutions, industrial power tools, assembly systems, and power and flow solutions. We bring a commitment to long-term success built on expertise, reliable service, and uptime. When you level to the Atlas Copco experience you enter a partnership based on quality, sustainability, and ease of collaboration. The technology we bring, and the decades of experience support the future-proofing of your business.

NAICS: 333
NAICS Definition: Machinery Manufacturing
Employees: 35,194
Subsidiaries: 15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Nippon Steel Corporation

2-6-1 Marunouchi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-8071, Japan, None, Tokyo, 2-6-1 Marunouchi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-8071, Japan, JP, 〒100-8071
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
https://www.nipponsteel.com/

＜Nippon Steel Corporation does not recognize this account as OFFICIAL, but it is open for LinkedIn subscribers.＞ On April 1, 2019, we renamed ourselves as “Nippon Steel Corporation” (from Nippon Steel and Sumitomo Metal Corporation), to keep in pace with our advance as a growing global steelmaker with origins in Japan.

NAICS: 333
NAICS Definition: Machinery Manufacturing
Employees: 618
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atlas-copco.jpeg
Atlas Copco
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/日本製鉄.jpeg
Nippon Steel Corporation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Atlas Copco
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Nippon Steel Corporation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Atlas Copco in 2025.

Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nippon Steel Corporation in 2025.

Incident History — Atlas Copco (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Atlas Copco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Nippon Steel Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nippon Steel Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atlas-copco.jpeg
Atlas Copco
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/日本製鉄.jpeg
Nippon Steel Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Atlas Copco company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Nippon Steel Corporation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Nippon Steel Corporation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Atlas Copco company.

In the current year, Nippon Steel Corporation company and Atlas Copco company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Nippon Steel Corporation company nor Atlas Copco company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Nippon Steel Corporation company nor Atlas Copco company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Nippon Steel Corporation company nor Atlas Copco company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Atlas Copco company nor Nippon Steel Corporation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Atlas Copco nor Nippon Steel Corporation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Atlas Copco company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Nippon Steel Corporation company.

Atlas Copco company employs more people globally than Nippon Steel Corporation company, reflecting its scale as a Machinery Manufacturing.

Neither Atlas Copco nor Nippon Steel Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Atlas Copco nor Nippon Steel Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Atlas Copco nor Nippon Steel Corporation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Atlas Copco nor Nippon Steel Corporation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Atlas Copco nor Nippon Steel Corporation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Atlas Copco nor Nippon Steel Corporation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References