Comparison Overview

Atlanta Printing, Inc.

VS

USA-Notepads

Atlanta Printing, Inc.

Norcross, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.atlantaprinting.com

Atlanta Printing, Inc. is committed to ensuring each and every one of our clients receives the most exceptional customer service and care. We pride ourselves on the personal relationships we build with our clients as well as the friendly atmosphere we strive to achieve. We are a values-driven company focused on providing the highest quality print work from beginning to end.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

USA-Notepads

50 Fresh Meadow Rd, West Haven, Connecticut, 06516, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
http://www.USA-Notepads.com

Since 1950 we have led the print industry in notepad and direct mail printing, serving non-profit, hospitality and businesses like yours every day! We Print What People Have Used For Over A 100 Years. Pads, according to legend, were invented by Thomas W. Holley of Holyoke, Massachusetts around the year 1888. His idea was to collect paper scraps from various factories, stitch them together and sell them at a fair price as pads. The pad evolved into the modern legal pad when a local judge requested for a margin to be drawn on the left side of the paper. Around the turn of the century NotePads had become a part of everyday business. In the twenties and thirties they developed into a proven marketing tool and a perfect way to get in front of one’s customer. Demand in the non profit and the hospitality sectors has made USA-NotePads one of the largest pad manufacturers in the United States, with the capabilities to produce over 1 million pads per day. Serving all 50 states with a product produced entirely in the United States.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Atlanta Printing, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/notepads-usa.jpeg
USA-Notepads
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Atlanta Printing, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
USA-Notepads
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Atlanta Printing, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for USA-Notepads in 2025.

Incident History — Atlanta Printing, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Atlanta Printing, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — USA-Notepads (X = Date, Y = Severity)

USA-Notepads cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Atlanta Printing, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/notepads-usa.jpeg
USA-Notepads
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Atlanta Printing, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to USA-Notepads company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, USA-Notepads company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Atlanta Printing, Inc. company.

In the current year, USA-Notepads company and Atlanta Printing, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither USA-Notepads company nor Atlanta Printing, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither USA-Notepads company nor Atlanta Printing, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither USA-Notepads company nor Atlanta Printing, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Atlanta Printing, Inc. company nor USA-Notepads company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Atlanta Printing, Inc. nor USA-Notepads holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Atlanta Printing, Inc. company nor USA-Notepads company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Atlanta Printing, Inc. company employs more people globally than USA-Notepads company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Atlanta Printing, Inc. nor USA-Notepads holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Atlanta Printing, Inc. nor USA-Notepads holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Atlanta Printing, Inc. nor USA-Notepads holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Atlanta Printing, Inc. nor USA-Notepads holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Atlanta Printing, Inc. nor USA-Notepads holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Atlanta Printing, Inc. nor USA-Notepads holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References