Comparison Overview

Atlanta Contemporary

VS

ICA - Art Conservation

Atlanta Contemporary

535 Means Street NW, Atlanta, Georgia, 30318, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Atlanta Contemporary, located in the city's historic Westside corridor, is one of the premier contemporary art organizations in the Southeast. Since 1973, we've focused on contemporary art and artists. Admission is free and open to the public, and our exhibitions change often - there's always something new to see. Join us as we build a community that offers ever-expanding support for the creation and appreciation of contemporary art.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ICA - Art Conservation

2937 W 25th St, Cleveland, Ohio, US, 44113
Last Update: 2026-01-13

ICA-Art Conservation is the oldest full-service art conservation laboratory in the country, and it is the region’s only nonprofit art conservation laboratory serving ALL museums, archives, libraries, and private individuals. It was founded in 1952 by the directors of six American museums, two of whom were monuments men, who understood then, just as we know today the importance of preserving material culture for future generations. Conservation Services Let ICA help you care for your artwork with specialized conservation services, aimed at preserving its beauty for years to come. Preservation Services Protect and maintain the integrity of your invaluable art and cultural artifacts, ensuring their longevity for future generations Education & Engagement Learn about our process up close with lab tours and hands-on workshops. Learn to preserve and protect your own irreplaceable objects with free webinars.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atlanta-contemporary.jpeg
Atlanta Contemporary
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ica-art-conservation.jpeg
ICA - Art Conservation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Atlanta Contemporary
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ICA - Art Conservation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Atlanta Contemporary in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ICA - Art Conservation in 2026.

Incident History — Atlanta Contemporary (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Atlanta Contemporary cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ICA - Art Conservation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ICA - Art Conservation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atlanta-contemporary.jpeg
Atlanta Contemporary
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ica-art-conservation.jpeg
ICA - Art Conservation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Atlanta Contemporary company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ICA - Art Conservation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, ICA - Art Conservation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Atlanta Contemporary company.

In the current year, ICA - Art Conservation company and Atlanta Contemporary company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ICA - Art Conservation company nor Atlanta Contemporary company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ICA - Art Conservation company nor Atlanta Contemporary company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ICA - Art Conservation company nor Atlanta Contemporary company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Atlanta Contemporary company nor ICA - Art Conservation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Atlanta Contemporary nor ICA - Art Conservation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Atlanta Contemporary company nor ICA - Art Conservation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Atlanta Contemporary company employs more people globally than ICA - Art Conservation company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Atlanta Contemporary nor ICA - Art Conservation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Atlanta Contemporary nor ICA - Art Conservation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Atlanta Contemporary nor ICA - Art Conservation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Atlanta Contemporary nor ICA - Art Conservation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Atlanta Contemporary nor ICA - Art Conservation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Atlanta Contemporary nor ICA - Art Conservation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N